To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 2989
2988  |  2990
Subject: 
Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 2 Oct 1999 21:51:19 GMT
Viewed: 
793 times
  
Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote in message ...
I still think using

0 FACE ( CW | CCW | DOUBLE-SIDED | UNKNOWN )


That works for me.

I don't suppose there's an official standards-setting body of people charged
with voting on extensions to the .dat format, is there?  Maybe it's time to
form one.

-Gary



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
 
(...) We're it. So to speak. Steve (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
 
Gary Williams: (...) I still think using 0 FACE ( CW | CCW | DOUBLE-SIDED | UNKNOWN ) is most practical. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

56 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR