CAD Development : 2952


CAD / Development / 2952	2951 \| 2953

Subject:	Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 09:06:35 GMT
Viewed:	816 times

Michael Lachmann: > You mentioned that some parts have a "0 CW-Compliant" tag. Could we do > something to make this a standard? Because than I could read this tag in > MLCad and make the drawing faster!!!!! I think we agreed to use 0 CW and 0 CCW lines in the beginning of the files to indicate (C)CW compliancy, but you should have a look at what Steve actually has written in his parts. > Tell me what you think! It would be very nice if you implemented this feature. Play well, Jacob ------------------------------------------------ -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:http://www.ldraw.org/FAQ/> -- ------------------------------------------------

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
(...) I'm willing to change my parts, if the standard changes. Assuming parts which are not C(C)W need to be flagged at all. (...) I agree completely. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Hidden surface removal, and vertex order in part/primitive DAT files
You mentioned that some parts have a "0 CW-Compliant" tag. Could we do something to make this a standard? Because than I could read this tag in MLCad and make the drawing faster!!!!! Tell me what you think! Mike (...) John VanZwieten wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

56 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search