CAD Development : 2239


CAD / Development / 2239	2238 \| 2240

Subject:	Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:49:47 GMT
Viewed:	70 times

At 04:38 PM 7/6/99 , Tore Eriksson wrote: > So far, I've only used LDraw's partlist and Lutz's, but I must say Steve's > looks very promising. > > When it comes to Lego databases, there is an infinite amount of data we all > wish to enter or seek on. Here's my two ideas to make Mission Impossible a > little more complicated: > > Would it be possible to make a web based database open for everyone to get > information from but with different levels of write access for trustees? > > I have started on a database for my parts. (Who hasn't?) I got this odd idea, > but yet I think it's useful: Entering stud count for every part! (I mean stud > or stud2[a] types). It's not always you can determine what theme or category a > part belongs to, but you can always count the studs on it and suddenly you > have eliminated many hundred parts from the search. EXCELLENT IDEA, Tore! Having that searchable would help a lot. Though it seems an odd characteristic to include, and no one would permanently categorize a piece by number of studs ('cept bricks, plates, and tiles), it is very helpful in narrowing down to find a piece. But the idea of the piece naming convention could come in handy. If there was an across-the-board naming system for auctions, databases, references, and LDraw/cad software, then people could look at the main parts database and find a part for any of these applications and know it would work. For example, someone could search for a part and find its part number online, go to LDraw and key in the number and know they would get the same part. While the VEC is useful, sometimes people don't always think in its (or LDraw's) set categories. Searchable and uniform are good... -Tim <>< http://www.zacktron.com AIM: timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 If someone tells you you're worth your weight in gold, fatten up.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Parts Database (Was: Idea: ... Lego piece naming convention?)
Tim Courtney skrev i meddelandet <4.2.0.58.1999070617...mm.com>... (...) Don't forget LDLIST, (URL) can search the LDRAW parts on any text in the description, CATEGORY and KEYWORDS, and show a picture of the parts found. (And I can modify it if (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
(...) Are you having problems with the pages I put up at (URL)? Do you have any suggestions on ways the pages could be restructured to be smaller, but still usable as a tool to locate a specific part by looking at images of a bunch of parts? Some (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)

80 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search