 | | Re: Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) Thanks for that info - I assume you actually have one rather than intepreting the colour from instruction scans? (...) Thre must be more than 100 torso patterns now, but we can number up to 9326p999. Chris (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments
|
|
(...) This was a numbers group suggestion. These only come in 7xxxx codes (and hence, only in black), but Terry really wanted to release them color-16. Rather than use 3-digit codes for this, we based them off the codes for the non-threaded version (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Cone primitives
|
|
Optional lines should actually be called "conditional lines." They are used to model rounded surfaces so that the edge-lines only appear if they form the outer boundary of the rounded surface. If you think of a cylinder, you want edge-lines to show (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Cone primitives
|
|
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3738A084.5D7527...ing.com... (...) in (...) Glad you asked. I just did this for the cone on the SW laser piece. You have the correct idea, using multiple cone primitives. Remeber it's OK if the (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Cone primitives
|
|
(...) Hmm, I'm using the cone primitives in 30384... How do the cone primitives work? The geometry of the canopy doesn't match either the con3 or the con4 primitive... right now I am scaling 1-4con4 to create part of the half-cone, and then using it (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) maroon red. So there really are 4 colors. (...) Yes, but eventually we'll run out as I beliaeve that there must be by now almost 100 torso patterns out of the 100 available. It's a questionable thing, but I think that the collar should be the (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Cone primitives
|
|
(...) Just out of curiosity, what are 'optional lines'? Jeff (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Which torso is this? Is it the one that is on most minifigs in the Camoflouged Outpost(6066, I believe)? If so, It comes in red, blue, and black. Jeff (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
(...) Yes - in fact the red (maroon actually, not TLG red) and blue versions are in the latest voting download as 9326p48 and p49 (but not on the voting page - see Terry's apology at (URL) have plenty of 9326p... numbers left, and using this (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
Horray !!!! :-) and yes it should fall under the windscreen catagory. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Define immediately :) Do you really think people want to waste their time on voting on these pieces and you waste your time on preparing them for voting when you could just kinda slip them into the update ;-) Ryan "Build or build not. There is (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Forestman Torso was Voting Page
|
|
Are we referring to the common forestman torso of the early 90's?? The one with the frilly-like collar?? If so it cam in red blue, and black, those should be the 16 color. If you are refering to the next wave where they had the brown trees instead (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | 99-03 Voting: Quick Comments [DAT]
|
|
I haven't had a chance to examine the parts in detail, here are some comments from a casual review: 290.dat (large shock, lower half): - There are some angled (helical) internal surfaces. Should those be present? I will check for myself tonight. (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Cone primitives
|
|
(...) That's odd -- my copy of 1-4con3.dat does have optional lines, but 1-4con4.dat doesn't. I'll send Terry fresh copies of both. Steve (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:37378F61.BEDC19...ing.com... (...) Nah. Too much trouble and it will make the piece look worse, not better. I'm going to leave it out on the X-Wing canopy as well. (...) I was considering doing (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Right. (...) Right. And I've (re)sent you the two newer versions of the half-bush, the towball grab, and (just now) the 1x2x2 brick. Steve (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
(...) Looking at the divot, I'd say it's not crucial. It would be a nice piece of work to put it in, but a real PITA to do. (...) You don't need to model molding lines, but there should be optional lines whereever the surface bends. The cylinder (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: dinsdag 11 mei 1999 4:38 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat I've worked out a small test DAT-file (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Pov-Ray background and camera angle help
|
|
(...) In the POV file, look for the line right above the Camera statement near the end: // Background: background { color rgb <1,1,1>} Those 3 numbers are RGB values (red,green,blue) All ones=white. All zeros=black. All 0.5=medium gray. 1,0,0=red, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Of course, with this background, the Technic Cam already has a proper orientation. Fredrik (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: bug found in parts
|
|
(...) Argh! So much for the search and replace..... Thanks, -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Wow. I must be psychic. Or psychotic. I sat down at the 'puter and suddenly had the urge to check the minifigs on the voting page. Dang! Left those pieces off! I then sent an email to Chris apologizing for that, and now (several hours later) I (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) 0 Baseplate 32 x 32 Service Station with Pattern That is all I have. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
there is no green collar forestman torso... it was an error in my source. (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) which pattern is that? set number? (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Could you include the three torsos which are in the current voting download, but are not on the voting page? 9326p20 Waiter 9326p48/p49 Forestmen Actually, Jonathan Wilson observed that this basic forestman torso also exists with a black (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Pov-Ray background and camera angle help
|
|
Hello. I recently created my first model on Ldraw, which took me like a week, and I have posted in on my webpage ((URL) I was wondering if anyone can tell me how to make my background on my creation to the one that is all white and has shadows of (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) I am glad we have all you deep-thinkers working on this. I Jeff is willing, I think we should do some testing of the various methods. Find out which one is best overall. As John said, having several pre-made lengths that are properly modeled, (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Changing midstream? No. But I will try to get another voting page up immediately following this one. -- Terry K -- (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Not funny? I thought I was being pretty witty. :-) -- Terry K -- (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) All I have of Steve's that was not included is the 309p01 baseplate. And I also have Chris's two saddles. So far that is it. OTOH, the the rubber boat is awaiting some further work. The harpoon, knife, and the new 9v motor were held and will (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | bug found in parts
|
|
i have found a problem with the minifig robot leg silver area subparts. they do not say official lcad update... they still say unofficial element (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | desperatly seeking mock-up parts
|
|
i am desperatly seeking someone who can make the folowing parts as mock-up the long bow (for the archers in my siege scene) the arrow bag (ditto) any 1 of the folowing (so i can have 2 different armies in my siege scene) black knights shield (to go (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Give me a break, will ya?. P133, remember? :-/ I do have a significant portion of my VEC converted to 25-colors. I did it several updates ago, but have not maintained it. -- Terry K -- (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on Part 30384
|
|
windscreen canopy x by x by x??? i think that is the best place for it. (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Working on Part 30384
|
|
I just started part 30384, the Naboo Fighter Canopy. I have a couple of questions: 1) There is a little divvet on the nose of the canopy. This seems to be a molding artifact, but it looks like it is a regular and prominent one. Should this be (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Don't take me wrong, I get the joke, it's just that I want those parts really badly. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) versions (...) btw, after i posted i came across another message of yours where you *had* grasped the rub in this situation... hmmm... i think that might be a decent idea... modeling various compressions would be painless.. i could tear them (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) actually.. that *is* funny!.. he he heh eeh eh e heh eh e he (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) cinderella, cinderella, all i ever hear is cinderella... hehehhee. just kidding... FG addressed this to me personally when i presented the part... and i agree with him that this is important (especially since i was the one who started all the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBJEHG.E04@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) Yup, undoubtedly more than my attempt at explaination. I think if you gave us correctly scaled coils at 100 LDU, 80 LDU, 60 LDU, and 50 LDU, we could use (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jeff Boen writes: one last addition on this subject from me... the only drawback to my method of custom building a spring of X length, made from the existing subparts, is that no matter how "compressed" the spring was in your (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) i'm not sure if you and steve are completely clear on what terry and i are concerned about... and even if the two of you are, i'll lay it out for everyone else that might be hazy on why this "compression" "no compression" "scaling" etc etc etc (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Pentium 166 with 32 RAM, nothing in the VEC directory (I use LDList) (without a VEC directory, VECCheck crashes): 5/10/99 5:39:40 PM VEC.Initialize - csStart 5/10/99 5:39:42 PM VEC.Initialize - csPartProfileWait 5/10/99 5:39:42 PM VEC.Initialize - (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) i *am* reading (although i've been out of the loop for a couple of weeks, had to go off and be "best man" at my best friend's wedding)... i *like* karim's idea... but... i don't know if that would just be complicating a process that we could (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) The inputs for such a program should be the x,y,z coordinates of both end points of the shock. That way, since you are using a seperate proggy to generate the shock, it might as well generate the whole shock, including rotation. It would be (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Cone primitives
|
|
I just realized the 1-4con3.dat and 1-4con4.dat don't have optional lines in them. Is there a reason for this, or is it just an oversight? -John Van (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Yes there is at least one other Train minifig who be classed as a "worker" - he has a red jerkin with a zip front and dots. Chris (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
So, Terry, since John's going to send them to you, are you going to make a quick update and ask everyone to vote again??? I don't think I could stand waiting more than another month for those parts. :-) Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) It took me a while to bend my mind around this one, but now I see Terry's point. Think of a cross-section of the metal of the spring itself what you would see if you snipped it with wire-cutters (perish the thought). You would see a circle on (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
So much for trying to be funny without reading all previous posts. -John Van Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn <nzlijn@euronet.nl> wrote in message news:004901be9ae4$32...0@n0079... (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3736dc07.459525...net.com... (...) The (...) center (...) The (...) Maybe I could work up a spreadsheet to calculate (based on the total length of the spring) the correct compression of (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
The harpoon, knife, and 9V motor were in the last vote but either needed changes or we were waiting on the chrome numbering discusion. I did make the fixes and sent them to Terry. The knife should be the only one to require voting, as the others (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Sorry, but I blew it! I've been creating parts and posting them on Lugnet, but not sending them to Terry. Time to get out the wiffle bats, everyone! I'll get these into Terry today. -John Van SCOTT R DENNETT <dennett@agate.net> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Oh, come on. That's not funny :( Seriously, what happened, I thought that he had made the neceassary changes right after he got the sets?? I really need them. Could someone possibly send me the dats that they have of them so I can use them as a (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Why would it appear oval? The scaling would be along the Y axis. The only difference in appearance would be that the windings would not be as steeply spiralled. Which is a correct appearance. Of course, my opinion is that the most-correct (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Interesting. At least one or two of these are parts that I sent to you, but must not have arrived. I will resend. Steve (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 13:09 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) If we (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Ouch! 30 seconds for the whole thing? Wow. Good thing there's room for improved performance in the algorithms. BTW, have you (or anyone) converted the VEC image files to 256-colors? (this would only affect the "csLoadPictures" steps) Steve (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Another negative thing I see with this method is that the dat file _must_ be manually edited to affect the scaling change. It can't be done from LEdit. This is what makes it difficult - at least for the casual user. Karim's method can be done (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) But this kind of thing isn't done for other parts, is it? Take the bushes, wheels, gear cogs and so on; they must all be rotated to fit the axles. (...) We could just argue that the cam is essentially a pulley/wheel kind of part, rather than a (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
-----Original message----- From: jonathan wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zondag 9 mei 1999 14:19 Subject: Re: Voting Page (...) Are we sure that train workers are dressed with this (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 10 mei 1999 4:05 Subject: Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat (...) Terry answered: (...) The idea (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) I believe all of John VanZ's SW parts are due to be released on the 19th. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Good point. An alternate idea would be to rotate it 90 degrees in the Y-plane. That would place its default position in perfect alignment with all the axles default positions. What does everyone think? Leave it as-is? Lay it down flat? Rotate (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Not sure about that one. That is kind of iffy. The term "chevron" is a pretty good description of the pattern. "worker" doesn't really add anything, as obviously the minifig is a train worker. (...) Good catch. "Shield Ovoid" would be the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Hmm... let's see.... Ooh, ick. Yes. I will add that one as well. Good catch. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) Leave it to Karim to be clever. :-) A very interesting idea. I am somewhat chagrined to have not thought of it myself. The only difficulty is the precise rotation needed. But I expect that the simplest way of using this assembly will be by (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) The pieces submitted are in the vote. If it is not there, it has not been formally submitted. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
i also noticed that the brick 1 x 2 with ferry windows pattern, the mindstorms light sensor, the rubber boat, the harpoon, the arm towball with grabber, the technic half bush type II, the saddle, the 1 x 2 x 2, the knife, the new 9v motor and the (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) i aggreee. i was hpoing to see the slope brick 20 4 x 2, plate 3 x 3 corner round, minifig tool pickaxe, wing 6 x 12 and if it is finished the tie fighter bracket piece. (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
Where are all the Star Wars parts John VanZ had done. I thought they were supposed to be in the next vote?? :( I am glad to see that torsos and heads have been worked on. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
(...) I have a fourth idea. It's a bit difficult to explain, but I'll try to make it clear: There would be a total of 3 pieces to make up the shock: A) Shock lower w/ half of spring B) Shock upper C) Spring upper half Since the spiral is fairly (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) parts like this normally lie flat in the X-Z-plane in LDraw? It makes sense to compare this part with the "Liftarm" parts in LDraw, and they all span the X-Z-plane. Fredrik (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
2 name suggestions... 1.minifog torso woth train chevron pattern to minifig torso with train worker pattern. 2. minifig ovoid shield to minifig shoild ovoid (for when we eventually move the castle shield ot the minifig catogory. also about the (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
i have a suggestion about the capatlisation of stud.dat could the referenced in the plants tree palm top be made capital? that ewould make it easier top position the leaves. just a thought. (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
|
Hi all, As any of you that have gone to the piece voting page know, there is a problem that needs to be resolved concerning the large Technic shock piece. To (sorta) quote from the page: ---...---start---...--- There is a problem with this piece. We (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting Page
|
|
OK, LDraw elitists, The voting page is up: (URL) are a couple of minor changes to the voting format - which may well change again. I am also considering releasing this months "fixes" separately. There are a lot of pieces that have been tinkered with (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3729f1f6.219707...net.com... (...) Pentium II pro-233. 64ram. 5/8/99 9:31:06 AM VEC.Initialize - csStart 5/8/99 9:31:08 AM VEC.Initialize - csPartProfileWait 5/8/99 9:31:09 AM (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
(...) OK. Here goes; Dell Dimension XPS P120c overclocked to a blistering 133mhz. Win95 build 4.00.950a IE 5 build 5.00.2314.1003 48mb RAM Full test: ---...--- 5/8/1999 12:19:42 AM VEC.Initialize - csStart 5/8/1999 12:19:45 AM VEC.Initialize - (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Hi Steve On my Celeron 400 running Win98, I get the following 08/05/99 07:42:39 VEC.Initialize - csStart 08/05/99 07:42:40 VEC.Initialize - csPartProfileWait 08/05/99 07:42:40 VEC.Initialize - csPartProfileWait 08/05/99 07:42:40 (...) (25 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Karim <knassar@mindspring.com> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: zondag 2 mei 1999 17:01 Subject: Re: Unofficial Part: 30357 (...) For me, April 30th and May 5th were corporate holidays, (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
(...) anyone (...) cad.dat.models.sets (...) discuss (...) Model (...) Its Repository, with subcategories Official and Creations - Creations being MOC models, Official being TLG. Crosspost to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, please. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
(...) Tim, I volunteered to head up this area. I need to confer with Ryan and anyone else who has volunteered (*is* there anyone else?) as to what guidelines are required for Model submission. I'll start a discussion in cad.dat.models.sets about (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: [Part] 3841.dat Minifig Tool Pickaxe [DAT]
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote on Thursday, April 29, 1999: (...) When I made the input routine for my L3 project (and thus the later spin-off L3P) back in the fall/autumn 1997 I made some tests on how well LDraw could handle these kind of broken lines. If I (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ------( Terms of use for lugnet.com )------
|
|
TERMS OF USE FOR LUGNET.COM OVERVIEW AND DEFINITIONS lugnet.com ("LUGNET") is a privately owned Internet site designed and run primarily for the benefit of those who enjoy building with, discussing, collecting, buying & selling, trading, and (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ------( Welcome to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw )------
|
|
Welcome to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, a LUGNET discussion group. CHARTER/PURPOSE: lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw (group): Focused discussion group for the planning and development of the domain ldraw.org, its website, and related resources. lugnet.cad.dev (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New newsgroup lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
|
(...) All righty, here it is: CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw (group): Focused discussion group for the planning and development of the domain ldraw.org, its website, and related resources. TO SUBSCRIBE ===...=== To participate (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New newsgroups in lugnet.cad.dat.* hierarchy
|
|
[Followups set to lugnet.cad.dev] Six new specialized newsgroup in the lugnet.cad.dat.* hierarchy have just been created for posting various types of LDraw DAT files -- for example: models, scenes, building ideas, and parts. For background on what (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
(...) Yes. Please talk to Jacob at sparre@cats.nbi.dk for more info on multilanguage support. Thanks! -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [LDAO] Could a few people test something, please?
|
|
(...) Oops. Dumb programmer trick. I've fixed this problem, and uploaded a new version. If anyone/everyone could give this a whirl, I'd appreciate it. (URL) Thanks! Steve (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
Yep, still here, still willing. Ryan "Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
(...) they (...) Great! Thanks, Jonathan. I don't have the time, but could someone check these models out like he asks? Also, I have forgotten if someone volunteered to head up this area. I know Todd was helping with the organization as it pertains (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
i have lots of sets ldrawn... i may/will ldraw more... BUT i need to know if the sets have any of the folowing parts missing are they ok? patterened parts raised baseplates large castle doors jail type door minifig accessories/parts e.g. helment (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [ldraw.org] Progress
|
|
During the last week or so, Jacob and I have worked on the templates for ldraw.org. I feel that they are just about set, and definitely ready to recieve content. I still need to work on the images for the multilanguage support pages in Danish, (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: L3PB Problems
|
|
Tamy (Mookie) wrote on Saturday, May 01, 1999 5:59 PM: (...) (garbled stuff removed) Thanks for the info. I noticed this too, just the other week. And I also got a mail from Terry, but I thought it only affected the Bounding Box comment, so I didn't (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
|
(...) The Primitive is done with 16 faces. The curve that makes up the outer edge of 3063 and my part has 32 faces. (8 per quarter). --Karim (25 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
|
(...) I think the cad.dev membership has fallen into a deep sleep, or else everyone is exhausted from panning jw's parts and doesn't want to think about parts for a while. Or maybe they've started a cad.dev.parts group and forgot to tell us :-) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Unofficial Part: 30357
|
|
(...) to (...) I haven't heard anything about this, so I'm going to go ahead and finish the part with the original curve. (...) this (...) I hope that nobody took this the wrong way.. it was supposed to be a joke. It is a paraphrased quote from (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
