Subject:
|
Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 May 1999 22:24:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
736 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, John VanZwieten writes:
> onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBJEHG.E04@lugnet.com...
> Yup, undoubtedly more than my attempt at explaination. I think if you gave us
> correctly scaled coils at 100 LDU, 80 LDU, 60 LDU, and 50 LDU, we could use
> compression to make springs length 50-100 LDU while only distorting the
> cross-section of the coil by ~15% maximum. I doubt anyone could tell the
> difference on a circle of 1 LDU diameter.
>
> For example if I needed a spring length 72 LDU, I would use the 80 LDU • versions
> scaled by .9 on the y axis.
>
> -John Van
btw, after i posted i came across another message of yours where you *had*
grasped the rub in this situation...
hmmm... i think that might be a decent idea... modeling various compressions
would be painless.. i could tear them up in a matter of minutes...
the question is whether or not we want thay many subfiles... i don't have a
problem with it, but some poeple prefer to keep things to a minimum...
once again, we'll have to let democracy rule..
J
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Discussion-Large Technic Shock 2909c01.dat
|
| onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBJEHG.E04@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) Yup, undoubtedly more than my attempt at explaination. I think if you gave us correctly scaled coils at 100 LDU, 80 LDU, 60 LDU, and 50 LDU, we could use (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
