 | | Re: Monorial curves
|
|
Jimmy Figiel <jimmyfigiel@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HD6nFt.1qF5@lugnet.com... (...) I made the existing Monorail parts, but hadn't enought time and enthusiasm to make the curves, ramps and points. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | LDAO Double-Click (Was: 9V Train Track Curves ?)
|
|
(...) I also wish that double-clicking a file had a function, but not opening the editor. I wish it opened a user-defined program with the file name (but of course its path first). /Tore (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Q? part 4626.dat stud spacing
|
|
(...) Yeah, I guess they are. :\ Thanks for pointing it out. I'll fix it and upload it ... well, as soon as we're back online. ;) Steve (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) Yes Steve it runs again. While you are working on the next version / update, can you make it possible that the Editor gets started when double clicking on a parts file name? Thanks a lot for this utility, it's a great help for creating parts. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2867.dat Curved 9V Track
|
|
Hi folks, For the interested ones, here are 2 pictures of the 9V Curved track i'm working on. top view: (URL) view: (URL) still working on it. I have to add all the line type 5's between every curve segment. I hope to get it reddy within 2 weeks. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Monorial curves
|
|
I saw that the monorail staight tracks were added to the official parts. Is anyone working on the curves? (I'm dying to make an animation of a monorail going around the track) Thanks! Jimmy (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Q? part 4626.dat stud spacing
|
|
Hello all, I am thinking that part 4626.dat may have the stud-to-stud spacing too close together. Nice piece. Thanks. later, James Mathis (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 1381 Vampire Crypt figs (and garlic tile)
|
|
(...) I believe those codes are alright. The garlic could be any of these, but I'd go with 3068bpdf - to match up with the vampire. Steve (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) You've got LDAO going now, right? After our email this weekend? Steve (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 1381 Vampire Crypt figs (and garlic tile)
|
|
(...) I hope so. Vampire is uploaded and waiting review as is Igor, IIRC. I am still working on Sound Guy but haven't gotten very far, would be willing to hand over my partially complete quad2dat file if someone wanted to take a crack at it... I (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 1381 Vampire Crypt figs (and garlic tile)
|
|
(...) Are these still the codes for the Vampire, Igor, and the Sound Guy? I know that some of the other codes have changed, but I can't tell what they should be now since ldraw.org is still refusing http connections. Also, anyone know the pattern (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: To Jacob, Tony and Steve (was Duplo egg)
|
|
(...) I'm working on it. I've got a mockup of the top part, I'll post it in the next day or so. Steve (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) ok (...) upps ... I was totally ignoring the primitive substitution in LDview, shame on me :-( (...) yepp ... I'll try to remodel the whole thing. many thx, w. (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) Before I had LDDP and LDAO to work properly, I made my own inliner: (URL) very plain, but it works. /Tore (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) You can do this in the latest version of MLCad. You can change the rotation point manually to any custom point such as the axes, the center of another part (like a cylinder). Very useful for symmetric parts, both rotational and mirror (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) Hi again, I could get LDDesignPad operational with several Plug-ins, but i'm still missing one verry crucial function, Rotate a selection of lines - or subfile - around the X, Y or Z axis. I use this function a lot to create the curved track (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) Hi, I took over from Tore. I'm re-working the MOC from Tore. I would like to work on it today, but i do have problems with the 'LDRAW ADD ON' program. It craches saying 'RunTime Error 76 - Path not found'. A few day's ago, i got no problems at (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
(...) I made a mockup a while ago that works for my purposes. I think Ludo Soete has taken over the work from me. /Tore (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 9V Train Track Curves ?
|
|
I see the straight parts on the tracker. Is anyone working on the curves ? -JSM (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Track System Parts from sets 4588 or 4586 yet?
|
|
I was wondering if the Track System Pieces from set 4588 or 4586 are available for LDraw yet. If not I might be interested in creating the dat files for these parts. For your reference, here's a bricklink url to each image of the 4 parts I am (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: PT File Checker Down
|
|
(...) I think this was a result of the server running out of drive space. I didn't do a very good job of writing a robust PT, at least when it comes to checking for file space. Steve (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: To Jacob, Tony and Steve (was Duplo egg)
|
|
Anyone? (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
I've created another drawing to help illustrate my descriptions below. Please refer to it while reading below. You can find it here: (...) The edge between the two ndis primitives is empty space. Conditional lines should never be put in empty space. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
(...) hi travis, thx for your suggestion. the removed lines are clear to me. I added them in a desperate attempt to smooth the primitive - just to see if I could rid of the problem, but I do NOT understand the fix. I added my comments below: 0 (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | To Jacob, Tony and Steve (was Duplo egg)
|
|
I went through some 1 year old messages... Jacob Sparre Andersen asked in message (URL) anybody considered modeling the Duplo Easter egg parts?" Then Tony Hafner aswered in (URL) could do cheesy mockups in LDraw along with good POV versions of them, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Duplo egg
|
|
Hi all, I do not know for sure if this was asked before, but has the Duplo egg part been made? Or some mock-up? Jaco (22 years ago, 2-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: PT File Checker Down
|
|
Seems to be back up. Thanks. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: PT File Checker Down
|
|
The same is true for the Submit Part page. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | PT File Checker Down
|
|
To whom it may concern: The File Check tool on Parts Tracker seems to be broken. When I hit the submit button, the tool resets itself (clears the file textbox and resets the part type to Parts). I tried several files in different categories and disk (...) (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Mine cost about $25.00 US. All you really need is precision to 1/64 inch since about 1/64 = 1 LDU -Orion (22 years ago, 1-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) I'm not in any rush to do so. I'm still gaining experience from doing more symmetrical parts. I can see that the Stormtrooper's helmet could take as long or longer than Vader's helmet. The Rebel helmet could be done in a much shorter time: (...) (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
(...) While investigating this, I determined two things. First, LDView does have a limitation that causes incorrect rendering of this file, but only when Primitive Substitution is enabled. Based on the way my smoothing code works, it's highly (...) (22 years ago, 31-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) And don't forget to visit the "Parts in process" section, they are all so incredible! Too sad I have no Vader Helmet, sure I would review your part, Thanks Paul, damien (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Here is a Link to an older posting showing pictures of the Helmet in process. (URL) (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Well, the Vader helmet has taken a very long time. Since about June of 2002. Keep in mind that there have been periods of several months of no ldraw... If you do decide to make one of the helmets, be sure to let us know so we don't take the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) FYI, I have fixed a few small errors on this part and have reposted it. Paul (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
(...) Yes, please elaborate on you technique. I'm interest in how all part authors model complex parts. This is something I've been meaning to ask for a while now but just haven't remembered. -Orion (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
Incredible. I've been interested in doing the Stormtrooper helmet (since I don't have quite the budget to be forking out $3+ for Stormtroopers) so I can model large scenes involving them. But I'm blanking on how to tackle such a small detailed part. (...) (22 years ago, 30-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Darth Vader Helmet on Parts tracker
|
|
Hi, I just wanted to let you all know that I posted the Darth Vader minifig helmet to the parts tracker last night. (URL) you download it, be sure to get all the unofficial primitives. Paul (22 years ago, 29-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New E-mail address
|
|
Dear fellow LEGO fans, I am sending this message to the groups I regularly read and post to, because since today my E-mail address that I used to post with no longer exists! It was jmolen@globalxs.nl... :-( My new adres will be jmolen@zonnet.nl and (...) (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.inst, lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) this is good news ... at least for me ;-) (...) this will hopefully become good news. many thx for sorting this out and giving me a helping hand. bye, w. (22 years ago, 28-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) Looking at how the geometry is layed out, I think you've hit a limitation in LDView's smoothing algorithm. In other words, the lack of smoothness is caused by a problem with LDView, not by a problem with your layout. The basic cause of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs writes: hi travis, (...) thx for the tip. I remodeled the whole thing and were able to fix it, well almost... looking closely in LDView you can see a rough area where the two 2-4ndis meet the rest of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Help needed with cond. lines
|
|
(...) I'm not sure the part authors will be able to help you, but my knowledge of LDView probably will. After looking at it in LDView (without actually trying to read your DAT code), I believe the problem is that you have a T-intersection, and the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Help needed with cond. lines [DAT]
|
|
Could some of the senior-authors please have a look at the cond. lines? I'm in trouble with the section around the visor holes. I tried to add some cond. lines but LDView still doesn't show it with a smooth surface. I have no idea what's wrong. Many (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) I checked some geometry websites, and the consensus is that these are tori. Just not the common type. (...) Inverse-ratio torus is a better name, but is fairly lengthy. An inverted torus, I think, is still a torus, just with the surfaces (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) When Steve and I were working on the format for the torii, I believe we said we would deal with this issue when it arose. Now it has. (...) The spreadsheet I made to create p/16 and p/48 torii also included support for this occurance. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) I'm not terribly surprised. This is a great solution, as then, if for some reason in the future, inverse ratio tori are needed, they can use the same convention, just a different starting letter and inverting the ratio as appropriate in the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) You might be surprised at how close t04o9999.dat would come. I can't see that it's any worse than the current t04o3333.dat file. Actually, I think I'm going to modify LDView to recognize nnnn in the minor fraction (where n is 0-9) to be (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Primitive Class
|
|
Actually, it's not a new primitive, but it doesn't fit under the current naming scheme. My current 33089 (in PT) is a rather bulky file (55KB), so to streamline it, I decided to make a few new primitives. One of these was a torus with major radius 1 (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) I think I agree with that. Actually, I could go either way. (...) Right. (...) I'm opposed to allowing additional comments between INVERTNEXT and the statements it affects -- one program's 'comment' is another program's 'meta-statement'. OTOH, (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 892 [DAT]
|
|
Hi, my name is Johan Vettefors and I've been lurking around here for some time. I have a question about the ldraw library. The part 892.dat which the tringle with clip in for example the lego sets speeder bikes and naboo swamp is NOT identical to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 4180
|
|
(...) I thought I remembered a more recent discussion about this, but I can't find it. What I'm seeing is that really instead of the current part 4180 there should be three composite parts: 4180c01--Brick 2 x 4 with Permanent Black Train Wheels (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) checking. (...) I guess I should have picked this up in the final checking for the 2003-01 parts release. Regardless of the results of this discussion, I have submitted a fixed part to the Parts Tracker. Chris (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Actually this is stated in the BFC spec but it wasn't enforced until the PT was created. -Orion (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
(...) I personally feel that whitespace should be ignored. However, if that is the case, the BFC spec should probably be updated to note this. It might also be argued that further comments after the INVERTNEXT should also be ignored. However, I (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Actually, no it wouldn't. It would render incorrectly after the primitive was BFC certified if you guessed wrong about the ultimate orientation of the polygons in the primitive. However, until the primitive is certified, it will not be BFC'd, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) No I thin khe meant that only new and updated primitives are required to be BFC compliant to be accepted to the parts tracker. Parts are still accepted that aren't certified though that is preferable. Though I'm not sure I've seen anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote: > Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 1 > 9 INVERTNEXT 2 > 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a 3 > 9 subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately 4 > 9 (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat? [DAT]
|
|
The file has these lines: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat Is an empty line allowed after INVERTNEXT? Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 9 INVERTNEXT 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) insist? Did you mean await? The whole file including primitives should be BFC compliant to have the CERTIFY. (...) Yes, a NOCERTIFY can be considered as a (temporary) turn-off-BFC, and other BFC statements should silently be ignored. /Lars (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) IIRC, my claim of making this BFC compliant was found to be incorrect when reviewed in the PT. So to expedite its release, I suspect Steve did an admin edit of the 0 BFC CERTIFY line (since we only insist on BFC compliance for primitives) to (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) You're welcome. (...) I understand that every effort is made to prevent errors, and also that this will never prevent all errors. I posted the message in order to determine if this case is indeed an error. I posted to this group because I'm (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
(...) Hi travis, Thanks for LDView, Each part is carefully reviewed by volunteers in Parts Tracker. That means if a part says CERTIFY you can be pretty confident regarding its usage of BFC-ed primitives. I think errors are still possible with (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
|
I think part 970s01.dat has a BFC problem. I'm working on my BFC parsing in LDView, and it printed an error in this file, so I went and looked at it. At the beginning of the file, it says: 0 BFC NOCERTIFY Then later in the file, it says: 0 BFC (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Ok thanks for the help guys. Maybe I should attempt drawing the part myself or recreate 6057.dat to fit my needs? :) Jos (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Jos Henckens <jos.henckens@nephilimco.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:m2047vo7vu2v91l...4ax.com... (...) The name "Bar .. Tapered" is "Boat Rigging .." in the parts-list. Only the smaller one is an official part. I'm not sure if the larger one has (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
(...) Only found the smaller version of this, part number 6057.dat. Should be under other parts, b in mlcad. (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Looking for part - numbers confused
|
|
Hello I'm looking for following part as described on (URL) : 2541 Brown Bar 5 x 28 Tapered I can't find it between the updates (both official and unofficial )at ldraw.org. Looking this number up at lugnet.com led me to some minifig parts? The part (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
Thanks for both the welcome and the help with the part numbers. I may start work on the 3070bp02 and 3070bp03 over the weekend (I have them in pixelated form, which are too large for submission, but I find useful for figuring out where to fill with (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) (URL)and (...) (URL)Also, some of the inventories in Peeron mention a tile with "thick 3" (...) (URL)or yet another pattern. (...) OK - I'll assign p01 thru p04 for the thin black figures, as in set 6395. You're right, there is a thick "3", (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) (URL) some of the inventories in Peeron mention a tile with "thick 3" pattern---I have no idea if that's 3070bp03 (URL) yet another pattern. -- TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick
|
|
(...) Welcome. (...) No - there is currently no linkage between the peeron pattern numbers (which just start with x1 and increment) and the official LDraw pattern numbers which we try to categorise. So please do use 30363ps1. (...) Yes - this is as (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Need to assign part numbers - Rotary Dial Slope Brick [DAT]
|
|
Hi all. I'm slowing delurking across Lugnet. I've been a member for a while, but I just watched and learned for nearly a year. I think I've got the LDraw system down fairly well, so I gave a try at some patterned parts (seeing that these are easier (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 2867.dat - Train Track 9V Curved (Mockup) 4 of 4
|
|
(...) < SNIP> Hi Tore, Verry nice work, i didn't start yet on the curved track, so what are you intend to do? Will you complete this part, or do you want some help? Regards, Ludo (22 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Obsolete subpart at the PT
|
|
(...) Thanks for pointing this out - parts/s/973pn0a.dat has been deleted now. Chris (22 years ago, 9-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Obsolete subpart at the PT
|
|
dear admins, the subpart Minifig Torso with Samurai Robe - Dragon Pattern: (URL) become obsolete. the code has been inlined in the already released official file: (URL) you please delete it? w. (22 years ago, 9-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: A Piece in CAD
|
|
(...) This piece has not been officially released yet and is not on the Parts Tracker I believe the name (if it were existing in the virtual world) would be Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted. Cheers, --Ryan ryanjf@ifriendly.com (URL) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | A Piece in CAD
|
|
Hullo CAD'ers ive been trying to Cad my models as I dont have easy access to a digi cam, so I was wondering if any of you knew where this piece, (URL) in MLCAD(the program of my choice)or if it had been put into LDRAW's files.... Any help would be (...) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Panel 1 x 2 x 2 without front - Two different versions at the PT
|
|
(...) parts/s/4864s.dat has been deleted from the PT. Chris (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Panel 1 x 2 x 2 without front - Two different versions at the PT
|
|
dear admins, there are two different versions of the "Panel 1 x 2 x 2 without front face" at the PT: (URL) Tue Dec 17 21:04:03 2002, the file was initially submitted. Submitted by: mkennedy while the second one has a hold votes: (URL) Tue Apr 9 (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Has "Orange" to be in a Subpart although not dithered?
|
|
(...) For reasons of strict compatibility, colors in part files are limited to 0-16, 24, 32-47, and 256-511. Any of the 'post-LDraw' color codes (17-23, 24-28, 57, etc) are not allowed. So for orange, you need to stick with the dithered version, (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Has "Orange" to be in a Subpart although not dithered?
|
|
hi folks, I continued my journey through the "holds" and ended up at: (URL) the follwing statement: Reviewer: Deckard Certification: hold Comments: Orange has to be in subpart is this true? orange (color number 35) is not a dithered color. why has (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Slope 33 3 x 2 without face -Two different versions at the PT
|
|
(...) I have deleted s/3298s.dat Chris (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Slope 33 3 x 2 without face -Two different versions at the PT
|
|
dear admins, there are two different versions of the "Slope Brick 33 3 x 2 without sloped face" at the PT: (URL) Tue Dec 17 21:02:03 2002, the file was initially submitted. Submitted by: mkennedy while the second one has two hold votes: (URL) Sat (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) liked to call him "The Ice Planet Kid". (...) I seem to remember that some early Divers sets had the Ice Planet head. 'Early' as in a few heads accidently got mixed in, or they were using up left-over supplies. I've never been able to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) You may be right but I'd prefer a non-theme specific name -Orion (22 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig Head with Messy Ice Planet Hair Pattern
|
|
(...) That isn't the case, is it? I thought the Wild West head was the newer white hair guy, on the left here: (URL) the Ice Planet messy hair appeared since 1993? TWS Garrison (22 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Naming of springs parts
|
|
(...) The spring is actually a part (assuming LEGO assembles their own pneumatic elements). So it should have its own number. I've emailed you the details a few minutes ago. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think the way it exists now is best. How noticeable is it that the sphere has no holes in it. Even if the part is transparent, the fact the the holes do not pass through the sphere is barely noticeable. Plus since this part is small in size, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) I think having the interior open would be a good thing for this part. However, we're rapidly approaching 1000 files backlogged on the Tracker. So I'm getting more willing to let stuff through that can be improved later. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
(...) There was this unofficial generic rule that details smaller than 1 LDU may be omitted. I don't know if it is still valid. Another good rule, always valid, is common sense... :o) /Tore (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Modelise inner details or use more standard primitives ?
|
|
I have a problem with the part Technic Pneumatic T Piece (URL) have two options - modelling a very accurate part, with inner details, but for this would produce a part with less standard primitives cylinder or sphere. - using as many as possible (...) (22 years ago, 22-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Naming of springs parts
|
|
I have modelised a the pneumatic pump. I have created two complete assemblies in two different positions. This part has a spring, so I have created two springs with different extensions. I have names these parts 2797s01 and 2797s02. OrionP, the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HAKr04.I7v@lugnet.com... (...) Thanks. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
(...) Congratulations, Much faster than what I expected. Sure, I will check it. Thanks, Damien (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
(...) Will this do? (URL) similarity of the the part number to Peeron is coincidence - x774 just happens to be one of my reserved nubers. Chris (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
Damien Guichard <damien.guichard@wanadoo.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:HAICsE.8HM@lugnet.com... (...) Thanks for this. This was also in some old Castle Sets. Bernd (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Minifig tool axe
|
|
(...) Although old part, it was never made, no mockup available as far as I know. Would be great for classic-space and town fans. Greetings, Damien (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Minifig tool axe
|
|
Hi all, is this part made as dat-file: (URL) the minifig hand-axe, or fire-axe. Please help Bernd (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
