Subject:
|
Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 05:17:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1243 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Kyle McDonald writes:
> Of course this would mean that the part might look funny in a
> BFC enable viewer until the primitive was fixed also but it
> would allow work to continue...
Actually, no it wouldn't. It would render incorrectly after the primitive
was BFC certified if you guessed wrong about the ultimate orientation of the
polygons in the primitive. However, until the primitive is certified, it
will not be BFC'd, so both sides of all polygons in the primitive will
render, and it will look fine.
--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
| (...) No I thin khe meant that only new and updated primitives are required to be BFC compliant to be accepted to the parts tracker. Parts are still accepted that aren't certified though that is preferable. Though I'm not sure I've seen anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
