Subject:
|
Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:01:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1224 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs writes:
> I think part 970s01.dat has a BFC problem. I'm working on my BFC parsing in
> LDView, and it printed an error in this file, so I went and looked at it.
> At the beginning of the file, it says:
>
> 0 BFC NOCERTIFY
>
> Then later in the file, it says:
>
> 0 BFC INVERTNEXT
>
> My understanding is that if you have a NOCERTIFY in a file, you shouldn't
> have any other BFC commands. They certainly won't do any good, since the
> NOCERTIFY says not to use BFC. There's also a comment made by (I think)
> Chris Dee that says:
>
> 0 2002-06-10 CWD made BFC compliant
>
> Perhaps it was supposed to say 0 BFC CERTIFY instead of 0 BFC NOCERTIFY? If
> the file is like this on purpose, is it valid? Is it valid to have BFC
> commands after a NOCERTIFY (which would presumably just be ignored)?
>
> --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
IIRC, my claim of making this BFC compliant was found to be incorrect when
reviewed in the PT. So to expedite its release, I suspect Steve did an admin
edit of the 0 BFC CERTIFY line (since we only insist on BFC compliance for
primitives) to make it "correct".
I think it is OK for other BFC commands to exist within a BFC NOCERTIFY
file, but that parsers should treat them as comments.
Thanks for the reminder that I do need to get this fixed.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
| (...) insist? Did you mean await? The whole file including primitives should be BFC compliant to have the CERTIFY. (...) Yes, a NOCERTIFY can be considered as a (temporary) turn-off-BFC, and other BFC statements should silently be ignored. /Lars (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | BFC problem with 970s01.dat?
|
| I think part 970s01.dat has a BFC problem. I'm working on my BFC parsing in LDView, and it printed an error in this file, so I went and looked at it. At the beginning of the file, it says: 0 BFC NOCERTIFY Then later in the file, it says: 0 BFC (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
