Subject:
|
Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 02:57:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1213 times
|
| |
|
|
Lars C. Hassing wrote:
> Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally:
1 > 9 INVERTNEXT
2 > 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used immediately before a
3 > 9 subfile command line, and it only influences the immediately
4 > 9 following subfile command.
> The coming (I know I've said that for a long time now) L3P includes BFC syntax checking.
> /Lars
I aggree that isn't clear.
The end of line #2 implies it needs to be 'immediately' before the
sub-file reference. I'm not sure if that allows whitespace or not.
But I also think that the phrase 'immediately following' on lines
3 and 4. could be interpreted to allow whitespace between it and
the and the type 1 line.
I think the only think that is disallowed, is other commands between
the BFC and the type 1.
I'm interested in the community's take on this. My program currently
ignores whitespace entirely as if it weren't present. This means that
my program wouldn't even notice this. If this is illegal I'll have
to make some changes. :)
-Kyle
--
_
-------------------------------ooO( )Ooo-------------------------------
Kyle J. McDonald (o o) Systems Support Engineer
Sun Microsystems Inc. |||||
Enterprise Server Products Kyle.McDonald@Sun.COM
1 Network Drive BUR03-4630 \\\// voice: (781) 442-2184
Burlington, MA 01803 (o o) fax: (781) 442-1542
-------------------------------ooO(_)Ooo-------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat?
|
| (...) I personally feel that whitespace should be ignored. However, if that is the case, the BFC spec should probably be updated to note this. It might also be argued that further comments after the INVERTNEXT should also be ignored. However, I (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | BFC problem with s/3070bs01.dat? [DAT]
|
| The file has these lines: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 6 box5.dat Is an empty line allowed after INVERTNEXT? Currently L3P complains. It takes the spec literally: 9 INVERTNEXT 9 This option inverts a subfile. It may only be used (...) (22 years ago, 20-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
