Subject:
|
Re: pictures at tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 May 2002 17:33:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
825 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Ross Crawford wrote:
> And thinking about it, I don't really think images for sub-parts & primitives
> would be super useful - generally these would be certified in conjunction with
> a part which references them, no?
Sort of. Primitives should stand alone, and not be considered
intimately tied to the file(s) which use them.
And it's still useful to see what the subparts look like, especially
when the descriptive title is somewhat undescriptive.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) And thinking about it, I don't really think images for sub-parts & primitives would be super useful - generally these would be certified in conjunction with a part which references them, no? ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
77 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
