Subject:
|
Re: pictures at tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 May 2002 05:43:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
826 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss writes:
>
> I agree. But I think (and I could be wrong) that people use the PT parts
> list differently than a Peeron inventory. With an inventory, people are
> more likely to be interested in the whole thing. With the PT parts list,
> I'd expect that people are more likely to be trying to zoom in on single
> entries. And there are some entries in the PT list (files already
> certified) that will be frequently un-useful.
And thinking about it, I don't really think images for sub-parts & primitives
would be super useful - generally these would be certified in conjunction with
a part which references them, no?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Sort of. Primitives should stand alone, and not be considered intimately tied to the file(s) which use them. And it's still useful to see what the subparts look like, especially when the descriptive title is somewhat undescriptive. Steve (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) I was thinking it could work like Peeron's [ref] links, and pop up another window. Not a great solution, but easier than having to remember to right-click the hyperlink all the time (IMO). (...) I agree. But I think (and I could be wrong) that (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
77 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
