Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sat, 31 May 2003 18:13:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2073 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 05:23:13PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > You can do that now by putting an image in you post
>
> right - that was my point. The fact that you could put it in a sig is
> the same thing, only easier. Just wanted to point out something to
> consider when allowing inline images.
Of course in practice it wouldn't be a very effective way for someone to snoop
because of image caching in clients. They'd log a few hits here and there but
not likely enough for any meaningful tracking.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) right - that was my point. The fact that you could put it in a sig is the same thing, only easier. Just wanted to point out something to consider when allowing inline images. Dan (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
