Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 14:55:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1671 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Jake McKee wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
| |
But I really do not think huge sigs would be a problem here. Posts are not
read in the manner they are on sites like BZP and FBTB. Meaning you do not
have to scroll allllll the way past big sigs to get to the next post.
|
Sure, it’s not read in the same way, but it’s still a nuisance. Most large
sig images I’ve seen have been in poor taste.
Anyways, huge sigs will be met with huge sighs by me.
|
On a somewhat unrelated note, Todd, do you have plans to be able to save
sigs? That would be a HUGE win to me.
|
Good one! I’ve been wishing for a feature like that for some time :-) I almost
never use a sig, cause I post casually far more often than I do as a
representative of a group or org.
Another one could be -- with the membership overhaul, allow members to upload
avatars of defined dimensions, for inclusion in the message header area when
they post. It would be a lot neater than avatars in sigs, and would allow you
some more control over their content if you (or someone else) was able to
moderate them.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
