Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 04:25:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1152 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
<snip>
Needless to say I agree with Tim that there is a good potential for abuse
here... I raised another type of potential abuse in this post:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/?n=4211
but it seems to have gone unanswered. Perhaps because it's blindingly obvious?
Perhaps because I posted in the wrong group? Anyway, consider this a **bump** of
that post.
Personally I reserve judgement on FTX capability in posts, overall, but my first
blush is, despite the very real technical niftyness, it's not a good idea...
Technical question? Can it be turned off again without disruption if for
whatever reason that were desired?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) Yup, I agree, and I think the posting page should summarize or refer posters to a page of netiquette guidelines (don't top-post; delete irrelevant quoted content; don't post annoying animated GIFs; don't post images too large; etc.). (...) (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Signature Image Abuse
|
| I haven't seen any of this yet, likely cause the FTX features are new. However, on the EZBoard style sites, many people include LARGE images in their signatures - non-standard banners for their sites, poorly made animations, etc. Sometimes these (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
