Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 16:59:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1494 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
| |
Or do you mean on a person-by-person basis? That would be a bit more
work.
|
That’s an interesting point -- I think it would preserve the freedom for
those who use it responsibly, and enable you to prevent abusers from
continuing to abuse the privilege.
|
I meant disabling the viewing of it on a person-by-person basis...not
disabling their ability to post that way.
|
So, does that mean that for example:
- I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a
or
- You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John Doe is abusing the
?
|
Neither... I meant:
- You, Tim Courtney, could disable viewing of all FTX messages. Other people would still see FTX messages.
But the other two options might be possibilities. (Although I’d hate to do
the second one.)
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) So, does that mean that for example: • I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a switch so LUGNET doesn't show me FTX formatting when I read his posts or • You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
