Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 15:29:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1446 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
| |
Or do you mean on a person-by-person basis? That would be a bit more work.
|
That’s an interesting point -- I think it would preserve the freedom for those
who use it responsibly, and enable you to prevent abusers from continuing to
abuse the privilege.
|
I meant disabling the viewing of it on a person-by-person basis...not
disabling their ability to post that way.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) So, does that mean that for example: • I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a switch so LUGNET doesn't show me FTX formatting when I read his posts or • You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) That's an interesting point -- I think it would preserve the freedom for those who use it responsibly, and enable you to prevent abusers from continuing to abuse the privilege. -Tim (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
