Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 May 2003 17:34:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Can there be ground rules laid down about tasteful images - at least when
> relating to dimensions and animation?
Let's wait a bit and see how it ends up being used first. I think the best way
to define ground rules would be with tasteful netiquette examples.
> I welcome the ability to format text as it's useful for large documents or
> multi-point announcements. The same with pictures - they're fun and useful for
> MOC or event posts. But, both have the potential to be abused, and I'd like to
> see some rules or norms established that discourage such abuse.
Yup, there's definitely the potential for abuse. This isn't a full chainsaw
like HTML is, but it's a pretty powerful axe. Before we can discourage abuse
of course we have to be able to define it.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) I don't think we'll have to wait that long... (3 URLs) (I know Chris was just joking here -- we were chatting about it at the time, but he was trying to prove a point by giving an example of overdoing it) I suggest limiting signature banners (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Signature Image Abuse
|
| I haven't seen any of this yet, likely cause the FTX features are new. However, on the EZBoard style sites, many people include LARGE images in their signatures - non-standard banners for their sites, poorly made animations, etc. Sometimes these (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
