Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 16:12:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1529 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
| |
Or do you mean on a person-by-person basis? That would be a bit more work.
|
That’s an interesting point -- I think it would preserve the freedom for
those who use it responsibly, and enable you to prevent abusers from
continuing to abuse the privilege.
|
I meant disabling the viewing of it on a person-by-person basis...not
disabling their ability to post that way.
|
So, does that mean that for example:
• I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a
switch so LUGNET doesn’t show me FTX formatting when I read his posts
or
• You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John Doe is abusing the
system, and have the LUGNET server not show FTX formatting on any of his posts
(while the server will continue to accept posts by him which include FTX, they
won’t display them for anyone)
?
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) Neither... I meant: You, Tim Courtney, could disable viewing of all FTX messages. Other people would still see FTX messages. But the other two options might be possibilities. (Although I'd hate to do the second one.) --Todd (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
