Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 16:44:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1293 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, John Henry Kruer wrote:
> Mmm, really, may I ask what was the intended purpose of including outside
> images?
For all sorts of things.
> I'm sort of confused here- no big images,
Not excessively big. Use common sense.
> no sig images, etc.
Again, use common sense. Sig images are fine if they don't annoy people.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> (...) Mmm, really, may I ask what was the intended purpose of including outside images? I'n sort of confused here- no big images, no sig images, etc. You could make a rule that simply says, 'no (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
