To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.suggestionsOpen lugnet.admin.suggestions in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Suggestions / 700
699  |  701
Subject: 
Re: Signature Image Abuse
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Thu, 29 May 2003 16:56:43 GMT
Viewed: 
2386 times
  
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 04:12:48PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > I meant disabling the {viewing} of it on a person-by-person basis...not
> > disabling their ability to post that way.
> 
> So, does that mean that for example:
> 
> ? I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a
> switch so LUGNET doesn't show me FTX formatting when I read his posts
> 
> {or}
> 
> ? You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John Doe is abusing the
> system, and have the LUGNET server not show FTX formatting on any of his posts
> (while the server will continue to accept posts by him which include FTX, they
> won't display them for anyone)

my guess is that I choose not to see any FTX formatting, ever, by
anyone.  That seems the easiest to implement.

Dan

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Signature Image Abuse
 
(...) So, does that mean that for example: • I, Tim Courtney, can see that poster John Doe is annoying me, and flip a switch so LUGNET doesn't show me FTX formatting when I read his posts or • You, Todd Lehman (or another admin), can see that John (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

41 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR