Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 May 2003 16:15:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1915 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:20:53PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> > Also, with a signature feature implemented, people will probably be
> > more inclined to use that than paste in each time. If it's not
> > convenient for them to store more than x lines, they won't. So that
> > will deter abuse as it is.
>
> it will allow a different kind of abuse. If I put an image in my sig, I
> can track who's reading my posts - just like doubleclick.net. Not sure
> if people are worried about the privacy implecations.
Hmm interesting. I can't think of anything really evil to do with that info
though... is it a big deal if others know if you read their LUGNET posts?
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) it will allow a different kind of abuse. If I put an image in my sig, I can track who's reading my posts - just like doubleclick.net. Not sure if people are worried about the privacy implecations. Dan (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
