Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 14:34:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1275 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
<snip>
>
> While I think the new FTX feature is neat for some of the good things that can
> come of it (embedding MOC images in posts, etc), I think it definitely has the
> potential to be abused.
>
> Can there be ground rules laid down about tasteful images - at least when
> relating to dimensions and animation? One of the reasons I don't read other
> boards as often as I do LUGNET is this very fact.
Mmm, really, may I ask what was the intended purpose of including outside
images? I'n sort of confused here- no big images, no sig images, etc.
You could make a rule that simply says, 'no images above 100 X 100,' which rules
out both images large in size and space.
-JHK
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) I think MOC images can (and should) be larger. I'm not concerned about size there (though others are). I'm on a DSL connection, running 1600x1200 resolution. But, I do respect those who don't have that available, and suggest images of MOCs (or (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Signature Image Abuse
|
| I haven't seen any of this yet, likely cause the FTX features are new. However, on the EZBoard style sites, many people include LARGE images in their signatures - non-standard banners for their sites, poorly made animations, etc. Sometimes these (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
