Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 14:31:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1678 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney wrote:
| |
| |
But I really do not think huge sigs would be a problem here. Posts are not
read in the manner they are on sites like BZP and FBTB. Meaning you do not
have to scroll allllll the way past big sigs to get to the next post.
|
Sure, it’s not read in the same way, but it’s still a nuisance. Most large
sig images I’ve seen have been in poor taste.
Anyways, huge sigs will be met with huge sighs by me.
|
On a somewhat unrelated note, Todd, do you have plans to be able to save sigs?
That would be a HUGE win to me.
Jake
---
Jake McKee
Webmaster - BIP
http://www.bricksonthebrain.com/instructions
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) Good one! I've been wishing for a feature like that for some time :-) I almost never use a sig, cause I post casually far more often than I do as a representative of a group or org. Another one could be -- with the membership overhaul, allow (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) If the guidance was given in a way that was accepted by regulars as polite, getting 'rubbed the wrong way' would be entirely the fault of the person receiving the correction. I don't think we need to go out of our way to make LUGNET a (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
