Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 May 2003 14:20:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle Keppler wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Jake McKee wrote:
> > > On a somewhat unrelated note, Todd, do you have plans to be able to save
> > > sigs? That would be a [HUGE] win to me.
> >
> > Yes, one per e-mail address. So you can have different sigs if you post from
> > multiple addresses.
> >
> > --Todd
>
> Sounds good. But make a clear limit on the number of charactars and/or lines.
Also, with a signature feature implemented, people will probably be more
inclined to use that than paste in each time. If it's not convenient for them to
store more than x lines, they won't. So that will deter abuse as it is.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) it will allow a different kind of abuse. If I put an image in my sig, I can track who's reading my posts - just like doubleclick.net. Not sure if people are worried about the privacy implecations. Dan (23 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) Suggestions on limit values? Standard sig size according to RFC 1855 (URL) 4 lines -- but that's a "rule of thumb" and not something written in stone (I think 'rn' or some other newsreader I used once upon a time enforced it, however). I'm (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
