Subject:
|
Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 May 2003 14:29:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1325 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > Technical question? Can it be turned off again without disruption if for
> > whatever reason that were desired?
>
> Do you mean can the feature as a whole be disabled? Yes, it would be trivial.
> Or do you mean on a person-by-person basis? That would be a bit more work.
That's an interesting point -- I think it would preserve the freedom for those
who use it responsibly, and enable you to prevent abusers from continuing to
abuse the privilege.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) This is what I meant.. if for whatever reason it's decided that FTX should no longer be allowed in posts, can you at that point - prevent people from including FTX tags? (I suspect not, at least not in an easy to implement but hard to get (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Signature Image Abuse
|
| (...) Yup, I agree, and I think the posting page should summarize or refer posters to a page of netiquette guidelines (don't top-post; delete irrelevant quoted content; don't post annoying animated GIFs; don't post images too large; etc.). (...) (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
