Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 14:52:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
558 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Do you? According to the _The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English
> Language, Third Edition_ it means "One that contributes something, such as
> money, to a cause or fund." The most applicable definition of the verb fund
> from the same source is "To furnish a fund for." So, when someone give money
> to LUGNET (or to Todd and Suzanne for LUGNET) they are funding LUGNET.
> Period.
I was umnaware that the American Heritage Dictionary was a resource for legal
terminology.
I am not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure the legal terms "donor" and "funded by"
are vastly different. I also think you're oversimplifying.
Donor, which TLC (well, at least Lego Direct) clearly are, implies that they
have made a donation.
"Funded by" implies total funding, covering all expenses. Which TLC is clearly
NOT doing for Lugnet.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| Lorbaat <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message news:FuLvzI.Gs@lugnet.com... (...) English (...) as (...) fund (...) money (...) legal (...) That may well be, but Chris has managed to back his opinion - you have not. (...) by" (...) they (...) (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) It does to me too. And there's nothing wrong with that. I'm a member, I haven't finished paying my dues, but when I do, I'll donate. And I pay higher than (I think) reasonable prices at Auczilla because I know that's funding LUGNET too (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
