Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 May 2000 00:28:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
630 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> To date, the total membership
> payments and all other donations (including Brad's) account for somewhere
> between 7% to 9% of what it has cost (in time, resources, and labor) to get
> LUGNET to this point so far.
That you know it's between 7 and 9% implies that you are using a labor rate for
your time... would you be willing to share what that nominal rate is?
(Just an idle curiousity question. I suspect that to many of us, the intrinsic
WORTH is of your work is 500+/hour, but that when all is said and done and
LUGNET is a way for you to make your living, when you tote it all up, you're
going to end up not quite having made minimum wage ... but having had fun,
which is the Main Thing)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) Instead of "somewhere between 7% to 9%" I should have said "between somewhere around 7% to 9%". It's an educated guess -- to know a "real" figure would require going back in time and taking a different path to get actual numbers. It's (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) I knew what you meant, and I didn't think you meant 100% funding. It's just very important to me to correct an ambiguity for something so important. In my mind, your statement "Lego funds Lugnet" (false) implied that LEGO has funded, funds, (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
