Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 19:51:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
490 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > So what did they _fund_ with their donation?
>
> Why do you insist on being so dense?
>
> Many people, including myself, have explained the difference between funding
> and donating to a cause. Yes, *in spirit* Brad Justus and Lego Direct would
> seem to "support Lugnet". No, in a *financial sense*, they do NOT "support
> Lugnet", which would imply they were paying all expenses.
OK, I'm being dense. Educate me a little. What are you basing this on? How
does "support Lugnet" mean they 100% pay for the show? It does not mean that
to me.
Scott A
>
> This seems to be pretty clear to most people.
>
> > "Note: LEGO has recently made a "no strings attached" financial donation not
> > believed to constitute sponsorship or endorsement in the legal sense."
> >
> > I have not seen anything which substantiates this statement -
>
> Have you seen anything that indicates something to the contrary?
>
> Personally, I find the disclaimer to be *very* clear in what it says.
>
> Additionally, I'm confused as to why this continues to be an issue for you.
>
> eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) Why do you insist on being so dense? Many people, including myself, have explained the difference between funding and donating to a cause. Yes, *in spirit* Brad Justus and Lego Direct would seem to "support Lugnet". No, in a *financial sense*, (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
