Subject:
|
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 May 2000 19:36:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
555 times
|
| |
|
|
Lorbaat <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> wrote in message
news:FuLvzI.Gs@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> > Do you? According to the _The American Heritage® Dictionary of the • English
> > Language, Third Edition_ it means "One that contributes something, such • as
> > money, to a cause or fund." The most applicable definition of the verb • fund
> > from the same source is "To furnish a fund for." So, when someone give • money
> > to LUGNET (or to Todd and Suzanne for LUGNET) they are funding LUGNET.
> > Period.
>
> I was umnaware that the American Heritage Dictionary was a resource for • legal
> terminology.
That may well be, but Chris has managed to back his opinion - you have not.
>
> I am not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure the legal terms "donor" and "funded • by"
> are vastly different. I also think you're oversimplifying.
>
> Donor, which TLC (well, at least Lego Direct) clearly are, implies that • they
> have made a donation.
>
> "Funded by" implies total funding, covering all expenses. Which TLC is • clearly
> NOT doing for Lugnet.
>
> eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
|
| (...) I was umnaware that the American Heritage Dictionary was a resource for legal terminology. I am not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure the legal terms "donor" and "funded by" are vastly different. I also think you're oversimplifying. Donor, which (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
43 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
