To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.market.servicesOpen lugnet.market.services in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Marketplace / Services / 89
88  |  90
Subject: 
Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.market.services
Date: 
Tue, 16 May 2000 15:24:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1135 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

since I switched to the web I haven't had my siggy reminding people that if
you sign up for eBates and use member ID lar 1/2 of my income there goes to
fund Lugnet(tm). So consider yourself reminded. :-)

Out of curiosity, how much sign-up traffic do you estimate your sig
pulled/pulls in?  I'm curious, because mine has generated squat.  I'm curious
as to why exactly - whether it's that people generally ignore .sigs, or that
alladvantage's sign-up takes too long, or simply that I don't post much
(lately) so people don't see it.  (or that people have an instinctive "where's
the catch" aversion to alladvantage?)

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
 
(...) not that much. Maybe 40 bucks total for Lugnet and the same for me. PayPal and X on the other hand generated more than 300 USD in referrals to me and as much back to the joiners (since I split 50 50 there). I can't speak for anyone else but (...) (24 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.market.services)
  Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
 
(...) Maybe because your sig doesn't include your member code? I've spent the last twenty minutes trying to figure out how to sign up and credit you. Only after seeing someone else's sig with a three-letter&three number code to input have I figured (...) (24 years ago, 20-May-00, to lugnet.market.services)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine
 
FUT to l.o-t.d (...) I really take exception to your tone and wording. The fact is that you're wrong. Plainly. Painfully. And then you have the unmittigated gall to call someone else dense. I think it is you who simply don't get it. (...) Many? The (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

43 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR