Subject:
|
Re: Todd, can we have an Arctic posting group?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 20:22:30 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.SAYNOTOSPAMorg
|
Viewed:
|
1981 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> Yah, or else perhaps alternatively, a message posted out of the blue to, say,
> _lugnet.cad could be sent to lugnet.cad without giving an error message. That
> could work for just about any virtual umbrella group except the top-level one
> and a couple others like _lugnet.admin and _lugnet.market...
"_" being a prefix for umbrella groups? Or is that just for testing?
I still think I like the .general idea. It seems clean and logical to me. (I
mean, why do we have lugnet.general instead of just posting into lugnet?) I
don't think that having a bunch of them is unappealing. In fact, it seems
more nice than giving the umbrella groups a different prefix.
And with that, posts to foo.blah could be redirected to foo.blah.general
pretty easily. (Actually, with the Newsgroup-rewriting scheme, a post to
foo.blah and one to foo.blah.general would be treated exactly the same --
both would be rewritten to say "foo.blah,foo.blah.general".)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Todd, can we have an Arctic posting group?
|
| (...) I looked around a bit in the newsserver code last night and I was thinking of setting up a virtual newsgroup called _lugnet as a test case, and just filling it manually with some stuff, and seeing what happened with a few newsreaders. Before I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
