 | | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
(...) I agree, I'm not sure. I assumed it would belong in .nntp, just because we're talking about threading, and how it should work... But looking at the nntp charter, it's not clear if it belongs there or not. (...) Heh, whatever I think of bashing (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
(...) The fact that past threads became debates doesn't mean that talking about NASA is OT for .geek. I'd recommend judging each thread by it's own contents, not by the history of the subject. (...) Regardless if anyone actually replies to the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
There is some confusion in my mind about whether this topic belongs in .general or .nntp... read the charter for general and it's on topic there. Plus that's where every other admin post is. So FUT to both I guess. (...) Whether it was already a (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
This is a reply to both Kelly and Steve (close by in the tree) and the FUT is set to just admin.general (...) I don't know what's proper. We're experimenting. I hope people won't get too upset about it, till we get it right. I did an experiment (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
(...) Had further thoughts about this - are there guidelines about recognizing at what point a thread should be rerouted into a different group? This particular thread, IMO, is pretty harmless (now), but I can see how (URL) threads can deteriorate>. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
|
(...) I think the topic of 'right level of notification/intervention' is worthy of public discussion. IMO, in this specific instance, the intervention was unnecessary. I hadn't read any 'debate' into the discussion, and any time 'NASA' and 'budget' (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
|
|
(...) It's not censorious, it's a condition of usage. No censorship is involved. (...) My personal preference is no. An administrative answer is, stay tuned. Personal preference again: Hold off till the answer comes down. (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: American Idolatry
|
|
(...) No. Your search does not demonstrate that it is necessarily OK or not OK, it merely unearthed incidents of use. The only conclusion to draw there is that the admins chose not to take action for whatever reason, not that using it is necessarily (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
|
|
(...) Can I use such work arounds? Adr. (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Addendum was Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
(...) Best to contact me not using that email--as it is a junkmail pit. Use braun at NOSPAM history dot rutgers SPAMKILL dot edu. LFB (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
(...) Lenny- I'm interested in shouldering some of the editing/proofing load. Given that I edit for a living, it might be of some use...:) Oh, and I've been around for a looo...ooo ooo...ooo ooo...ooong time. best LFB (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
I can do some editing/proofing, and some writing. Part of my job is technical writing, and I do a bit of Web design (no nitty-gritty HTML coding, though). Just let me know. James Wilson, Dallas, TX Lugnet member #1783 (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
(...) As payment, you'll have to give me a little Lugnet logo next to my name, just like Lenny. Not. What did you guys have in mind? -JHK (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
(...) Sure I live on free. -JHK (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
(...) If you work for free, heck, I'll load you up! ;-) -Tim (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
I can't do any coding but I'd be happy to do some editing/proofreading/general writing. I'm here just about every night for a few minutes though I don't post much. (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
I'll do any boring code and html stuff. Give me something! I'm bored! -JHK (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
|
Dear LUGNET Users, One of the main goals of the LUGNET Tranisition Team is to make LUGNET more open and friendly to new members of the community. In that spirit, and full-filling my role as Content Coordinator, I am putting together a team of (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Bricklink has such a mode, actually. (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Perhaps each thread should be individually expandable/collapsible with this view option. Sometimes a thread starts out uninteresting to me, but a turn piques my interest and I start following. I'd hate to miss stuff like that (as I read (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I've been thinking that it might be very useful if LUGNET had a mode (in the web interface) where only the first message in each thread were displayed. This would make it much easier for people to ignore the topics that they don't wish to read (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I think I speak for all of us when I say... If we had seen this when only Randall had posted, that's where we would have started trying to guide to the right place. It was too late for that when I first saw it though. But I agree, his post was (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I agree, I just think that the LUGNET admins were jumping all over the respondants and not so much to Randall. "Taking names" and "check your attitude at the door" and such comments seemed to be fairly aimed at us who wanted to defend the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) You make a good point, Alfred. Personally, I think Randall's original message to lugnet.general was misplaced -- although I believe he was probably trying to reach people in lugnet.general specifically since that's where so much vitriol had (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
|
[Trimmed .cad.dev.org.ldraw, we're way off topic for that group] So, could there be an option on the web-interface for this? Like a checkbox for "start a new thread with message"? Then the web interface could automatically add some kind of X-header (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) Hi Terry, I'm still upset about it too. (...) Randall is probably as upset about hearing complaints from people like us as we are about the color change. The best thing we can do to honor requests from Randall and others is to talk about it in (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.color) !
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) I've got it. How about .ranting? I'm kidding. Steven Weiser (22 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
(...) The most appropriate place for this question is lugnet.admin.general, to which I've set followups, but to answer your quesiton: Appropriate posts to lugnet.general are posts for which there is no more logical group that applies. In rare cases, (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.color, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
|
(...) Thanks! Maybe even crosslink, with the first post in the continued tree pointing (with an explicit label) back to the root of the previous tree too. (...) Yes! (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
|
(...) Very good idea! (...) And it helps future readers when the linkage is spelled out explicitly. Steve (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
|
(...) I wish 100 was a user selectable option, or an option by group or something. But I don't know enough server internals to know if that's feasible. (...) One of the primary ways that I do LUGNET research (and the way I used to do the research on (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributer Agreement v2
|
|
(...) Good suggestion given the way LUGNET is set up now. My main reason for posting revisions in the same thread is so the discussions following the various revisions can be linked. But, you are right, when it grows to over 100, then it becomes (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ted Michon wrote: (snip and not picking on Ted in particular) I will not dispute, and *have* not disputed, the validity of the color topic as a topic that can and should be discussed on LUGNET. However I dispute that it is an (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Issue with profile and from field:
|
|
(...) Did you fill out a new posting setup when you changed your e-mail? Do you use the web interface or NNTP? If you fill out the posting setup form again, we can push it through and your setup should change. Frank (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Issue with profile and from field:
|
|
LUGNET Admin, Ted Michon in a reply to a post under lugnet.events pointed out something I had not noticed. Under the message header the From Field indicates: From: Todd Thuma <thumat@gactr.uga.SA...TOSPAMedu> My profile has long since been changed (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with web interface word wrap
|
|
(...) I have had a couple of my posts do this recently, I post via the web interface. (URL) was a reply. (URL) was a new post. They display in preview mode correctly, but not once they are posted. The second time it happened I noticed that it wasn't (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with web interface word wrap
|
|
(...) No it is also incorrectly wrapped in newsreaders, so it must be stored incorrectly. It would be useful to know which method was used to post it, maybe the wrapping works differently depending on posting method? ROSCO (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with web interface word wrap
|
|
(...) Yeah, that was driving me nuts recently in the subfile mirroring thread. I'm pretty slow, so every time it happened I got frustrated when I couldn't find the reply button. For some reason that's the only button you have to scroll (and scroll) (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problem with web interface word wrap
|
|
Todd, I'm sure you already know about this since I've been seeing this phenomenon for a while now. Every so often an article on the web interface doesn't word wrap properly. A perfect example of this is here: (URL) occurs on both Mozilla and IE so I (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Why not? The folks in .debate cast aspersions all the time. (...) Maybe so, but bionicle isn't under off-topic, and isn't included in the default skip filters. Try the "animal" search youself. Imagine you're 8, searching for animal building (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) The "sewer"? That seems pejorative. You may no longer like debate but why cast aspersions? I could just as easily argue that I want .bionicle filtered out when searching at the top level as .debate with about as much validity. I think any hard (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Well, most of the time you get two choices for news search, just not at the top level. How about giving us two choices at the top level as well? "News" would be everything we get now, minus .debate. "News (Everything)" could be what we get (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) I think the issue is that then the only way to search for things in off-topic.debate would be to search there explicitly, and conversely, that no posts to off-topic.debate would *ever* show up in a regular search. So (say) if I were looking (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) That would be trivial. But not a very good solution. --Todd (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Sounds like the solution is to remove .debate from the top level index file, but leave it in the off-topic subtree index files. How hard could that be? Don (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) it was on your skiplist! :-) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) been fairly easy. Two weeks after that, however, I wrote a brand new search indexer and results engine which runs on the order of 100 times faster, but which doesn't make such filtering so easy. The old way, what it did was found all the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Silly me, I should have checked. Would it be worthwhile to post in admin.suggestions? Apparently this came up 4 years ago and you hinted that it might be an easy fix? (URL) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Heh, nope, you always knew :) (URL) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) Nothing has changed here, no. The following are not indexed... Anything in lugnet.off-topic.test and subgroups Any automatic posting by the server in lugnet.admin.statistics Any automatic posting when a new group is created. ...everything else (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
(...) wow--that is goofy. I just tested this out and Don is right. I got search results from off-topic groups. I always thought off-topic groups did not show up in search results?? Is this broken now?? ____ (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Apply skip filter settings to searches.
|
|
Why don't my skip filter settings apply to searches? I did a search for "animals" hoping to find some building hints, but most of the hits came from .debate, and you can guess what *they* were talking about. Now I don't mind seeing the .debate hits (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Unsubscribe from Lugnet-by-email
|
|
(...) Thanks for that Todd. Now I can check the groups via NNTP without having my inbox overloaded. Cheers, Daniel Okely (22 years ago, 7-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Unsubscribe from Lugnet-by-email
|
|
(...) Daniel, I ran a script on the server which (half-)manually unsubscribed you. --Todd (22 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Unsubscribe from Lugnet-by-email
|
|
(...) I tried again, copying *exactly* from the email and it still didn't work. So ... Todd, if you could sort this out for me I would be most grateful. Cheers, Daniel Okely (22 years ago, 2-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Ministry Of Information Retrieval
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Chris Giddens wrote: (SNIPPED) (...) Let me repeat. off-topic.geek is NOT an appropriate place to have this discussion. What Chris posted really starts to veer into an .admin topic, actually, as it touches on community (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Thank you Lenny, I appreciate the response and the help. (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Understandable but for lay-users it would be nice if the "mighty" admins would simply reply to the request and say "Working on it". :) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Unsubscribe from Lugnet-by-email
|
|
(...) What you are doing SOUNDS right. What I know has thrown this off in the past is if there are any differences in the email addresses being used. You may want to check to see if the email address that the subscriptions are being sent to matches (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Brian, no need to bump. Last night the admins had a discussion about how to implement this. It is definately on the to-do list, no worries. -Lenny (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Please don't bump on LUGNET. The admins are aware of your request. Bumping makes some of the admins grumpy. (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Just bumping this up. (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Unsubscribe from Lugnet-by-email
|
|
Hi, I'm currently subscribed to receive several lugnet.cad groups by e-mail. Works a treat and I get lots of mail. However, I now want to unsubscribe (and continue reading by NNTP). When I go to (URL) and enter my email and confirmation code the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link syntax problem in news readers
|
|
(...) I whined about this format when the standard first appeared. My concern was that I'd seen lots of emails/postings/etc. that enclosed a URL in angle brackets, and this format doesn't follow that convention. Instead, the presentation software (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link syntax problem in news readers
|
|
(...) I uploaded a screenshot of the message to Brickshelf: (URL) you can see, everything between the < > is being read as the url. The link shows up as "(URL) in my browser. -- Thomas Main thomasmain@myrealbox.com (22 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link syntax problem in news readers
|
|
I have problems everyday with clickable items in my newsreader for NNTP (Outlook Express 6). If the people who post their MOC's link would put a space between the link and the thumbnail, it would solve 1 problem. On a seperate note, Lar, the "raw" (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Link syntax problem in news readers
|
|
(...) That one works fine for me in IE6. I don't recall anyone posting screenshots as Todd suggested in the thread you referenced, so perhaps it fell off Todd's radar? The underlying HTML (that I see via View Source from web view) is as follows: (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Link syntax problem in news readers
|
|
Is the problem of FTX formatted links not working properly in news readers still being worked on? I found this post about it from last year: (URL) am still having to edit urls in my web browser after clicking on them from my news reader and have (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Who made this?
|
|
(...) Yup, I just noticed it. Thanks for the heads up, though. Thing is, the confirmation e-mail took a while to reach me, and I then took a while to answer. I'm afraid I didn't check new posts in the meanwhile, sorry. I've noticed some of my (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-04, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Help Needed
|
|
(...) Thanks Tim! I just got the conformation e-mail saying my info has ben updated. Once again thank you for your help, now I've got to go finish a MOC I've been working on! (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Intermittent problem: Server error viewing post
|
|
(...) I opened the hood and found that Perl was segfaulting when generating a couple of the webpages reported. I switched the shebang line to another version of Perl and that seems to have cleared it up. Segfaults in Perl are spooky. --Todd (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Intermittent problem: Server error viewing post
|
|
(...) I can view them all in my newsreader, and don't seem to be having any trouble posting, so I'm guessing it's only affecting the web viewer. But I could be wrong. ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Intermittent problem: Server error viewing post
|
|
(...) Weird - I can view this message, and Kyle's (URL) and a couple of others on peerons ticker. Doesn't seem to be related to whether or not I've previously viewed them or anything else I can figure. ROSCO (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Intermittent problem: Server error viewing post
|
|
Various users are noticing various intermittent problems trying to view posts. I dunno if this one will even make it out there or not. People may not want to post long things that took a lot of work to compose, unless they have them saved away, till (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Help Needed
|
|
(...) Yep, I was writing mine as his reply was being posted, it seems. Thanks fellows, I can already tell that the new changes (ie: more people with power) are really helping. ~Kevin Blocksidge (22 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Help Needed
|
|
(...) See Tim's reply. His instructions are correct whether you're a member or not. (22 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Help Needed
|
|
(...) I'm going to second this one. I am a member, and recently got a new e-mail. ~Kevin Blocksidge (22 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Posting Help Needed
|
|
(...) Matt - Linked off of news.lugnet.com is this page: (URL) there, fill out the form with your new address, and submit. You should be good to go within 24hrs after that (someone will approve your new address to post). After that, the confirmation (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting Help Needed
|
|
First off, I'm not sure if this is in the right newsgroup, if it is not, I'm sorry. I'm not a LugNet member, but I do have posting priviledges, and do post occasionaly. I recently got a new e-mail address, and would like to know how to change the (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: i decided to
|
|
(...) I completely and thoroughly reject the notion that I was being mean. (...) I agree, we should make an effort to foster a generally positive environment here. I also value intelligent posts with reasonable effort given to composition and (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: i decided to
|
|
Original message cancelled, reposting with XFUT --> admin.general. (...) Regardless of those other forums being lax, here on LUGNET, people judge you based on how you conduct yourself. Since this is the internet, one of the few ways to evaluate that (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: i decided to
|
|
(...) This is, in my considered opinion, *off topic* for the off-topic.debate newsgroup as it has to do with the norms and standards of LUGNET itself. If you have an issue with the approach Tim, or anyone else, uses to try to improve things on (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New LUG
|
|
Tim Courtney told me to send an e-mail to lugnet.admin.general to have CedarLUG added as a mailing list. I would appreciate: lugnet.org.us.cedarlug Here is some information about the LUG. Club Name - CedarLUG Interum President - Brian Pilati (Cedar (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Number of Search Hits?
|
|
(...) Hmm.. That explanation appears correct--I must have mis-interpreted what I was seeing previously. I'll try the "compact view." Thanks to you both for your input! Dave! (22 years ago, 16-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Number of Search Hits?
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20040615213343....ron.com... (...) LEGO) (...) displayed. (...) 10 (...) used to be (...) browsing of (...) Yup that seems right, except I seem to get 20 per page. You can use the compact form to (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Number of Search Hits?
|
|
(...) I thought the qn was how many results to skip - so by entering 100, you're skipping to page 10? Not sure though. (22 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Number of Search Hits?
|
|
I just noticed that a search on LUGNET for an generic term (such as LEGO) returns some 121000 hits, and the first ten relevant posts are displayed. (URL) one selects "next page" at the bottom, it brings up the next handful: (URL) if one changes the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
Thank you, Tim. (22 years ago, 14-Jun-04, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help Please!
|
|
(...) Here's my understanding: The interim fix of allowing more admins to do it doesn't require any code changes, just permissions changes (who can access certain screens). It's not prudent to undertake code changes with a server move pending. Once (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUG
|
|
(...) Hi Brian - Please send a note to lugnet.admin.general asking for the creation of the group. I assume you want lugnet.org.us.cedarlug? Mention that in the post. Also, put together a quick sentence Todd can use while creating the group (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with member profile / password
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.pieniazek@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Hz4JyM.6A0@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Hmm, I thought the strength requirements had been relaxed. I'm using a password originally considered weak. I honestly have not had to (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help Please!
|
|
(...) Just curious - any reason why the new feature won't just allow people to reset their own passwords (in addition to allowing admins to reset anyone's password)? (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help Please!
|
|
(...) You need to get hold of Todd, as currently he is the only one that can reset your password for you. At some point, we hope soon, other people (such as Frand and myself) will be able to do this as well. I have a suspicion that you may have (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with member profile / password
|
|
(...) This is not a new concern. In fact, if you read back issues of this very discussion group, you'll find me (4 years ago or whatever it was) railing bitterly against how restrictive the password rules are. (...) That's not making me feel really (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with member profile / password
|
|
(...) Frank- Thanks for the reply! In my opinion, the LUGNET rules for passwords are the most restrictive that I have ever encountered (including password selection for classified military computer systems). Granted, the LUGNET rules and password (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password help Please!
|
|
I have forgotten my password and would love to log on, but without it it is impossible. Please help me remember my password or show me how to get a new one. I'd be happy to contribute to Lugnet financially if only someone out there would help me (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spiderman Building with all the black steep slopes...
|
|
(...) Maybe there's room for a lugnet.spiderman group? I've posted this to admin.general for consideration... ROSCO (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help with member profile / password
|
|
(...) Currently Todd is the only one who can do this. I suggest you send him an e-mail to request he change it. (...) Hmm, what do you mean by this? The rules on what a legal password is are not very restrictive. There are no immediate plans to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Help with member profile / password
|
|
Hi, All- Is there a resource for help with editing my member profile and changing password? Specifically, my "home state" is wrong and I can't find an option to change it on the member profile page. Secondly, are there plans to change the password (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Transition Update
|
|
I for one am glad to see the progress that has taken place. I also feel comfortable with the people being brought on board. I continue to be amazed at how well this community (the AFOL community in general, and all of the orgs) do such wonderful (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
