To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 11751
11750  |  11752
Subject: 
Re: Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:20:19 GMT
Viewed: 
726 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Adrian Egli wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
  
On a side note, does LUGNET’s censorious

It’s not censorious, it’s a condition of usage. No censorship is involved.

  
   stance on profanity permit these juvenile, if clever work-arounds like A-hole and F-bomb? If so, what’s the point?

Chris

Can I use such work arounds?

My personal preference is no. An administrative answer is, stay tuned. Personal preference again: Hold off till the answer comes down.



Message is in Reply To:
  Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
 
(...) Can I use such work arounds? Adr. (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR