To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 24708
24707  |  24709
Subject: 
Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:06:21 GMT
Viewed: 
4710 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Steven Barile wrote:
  

Well I finally completed a coach set I have been dreaming about building for years.


Hi Steve,

I just agree the positive feedback posted in this thread. These coaches look great and, more important than anything else, you seems having fun to build them. (I particularly like the color scheme (aka livery) :-))

One point I am still curious is the “compressionism”.

Many rolling stocks MOCs (not only 8wide but also 6wide) are compressed. I understand the aim is to make the trains to fit perfectly with the curved tracks but it has some consequences, for instance an oversized undercarriage gap : the trucks (boggies) looks to big, the base too high. This point can be seen on this picture : http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/SEBarile/coaches/DRG/p1010623.jpg

and compressionism just don’t respect the scale... I’m curious about how do the LEGO train community feel with compressionism ?

Anyway, thanks for sharing.

Didier



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
 
(...) I think it depends on what you are trying to acheive. In this example Steve has used compression pretty well, its not as a compressed as a Lego designed train but he has managed to chop a considerable amount out without it looking 'wrong' (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
 
(...) Can't speak for anyone else, but I see it as just about mandatory to do anything useable, and still have bricks left over. Replicating every window, every seat, every rivet is just not possible, so leave some out, as long as the feeling is (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
 
(...) Personally, I try and avoid it like the plague. I consider building 6 wide trains an (unnecessary) exercise in width compression. Of all the types of compression, this particular one makes a train look wonky IMO. There is just no getting (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
 
(...) With engines I always try to build to scale as far as possible, with coaches this usually isn't possible due to length vs curve radius and a few other practical limitations. Around 50-60 studs would be the max for length of any rail vehicle. (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Compressionism
 
(...) I felt uncomfortable with compressionism (for my own MOCs) and I prefered not compress, choosing between staying stuck in 6-wide or not running my trains on difficult layout (uneven, curved,...). This thread (and Steve's beautiful colored (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  D&RGW coach set
 
(3 URLs) Well I finally completed a coach set I have been dreaming about building for years. I tend to be drawn to color scheme (aka livery) than body shape, which is totally in sync with my predisposition to rare LEGO colored elements. And of (...) (19 years ago, 28-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX) !! 

61 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR