Subject:
|
Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:28:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5040 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > hey, even a mixture of the two. A good example of the former would be this model
> > (IMO) and/or Shaun Sullivan's Hudson (see the .trains sidebar)
>
> Agreed, those models aren't built primarily for their running qualities.
>
> > and a good
> > example of the latter would be Lar's ATSF
>
> Except that I found out (second hand, I wasn't there, I was in S'pore) that it's
> not as good a runner as I had hoped. Needs tuning on a big layout... Sigh. I
> agree about INTENT though!
>
> > or any James Mathis stuff,
>
> Some of JM's earlier virtual only stuff needed tuning when people tried to build
> it real world too.
>
> > or official TLC stuff too.
>
> Except when it doesn't run well. Sigh.
Seems to me you have a lot of problem(s) running LOL!
;-)
Legoswami
Highly subtle one, 50/50 chance you'll get it, IMO.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Compressionism (D&RGW coach set)
|
| (...) Agreed, those models aren't built primarily for their running qualities. (...) Except that I found out (second hand, I wasn't there, I was in S'pore) that it's not as good a runner as I had hoped. Needs tuning on a big layout... Sigh. I agree (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
