To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17339
17338  |  17340
Subject: 
Re: Brad J Brickfest 2002 Keynote Speech synopsis
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:56:15 GMT
Viewed: 
2895 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
Hmm.  I didn't intend it to be a statement of your character - I've seen
enough of your posts to know you're intelligent enough to see it for exactly
what it was - "a famous trick question".  I was highlighting, admittedly in
an oblique way, that your question "Why is it smart to discontinue an
accessory pack that has sold out?" is forcing the person asked into a
particular type of answer.

That's pretty sketchy.

My question was essentially rhetorical. I didn't expect to get any kind of
reply at all -- the fact that I got replies from some of the usual persons
makes those replying apologists (the negative connotation this word may have
is not my fault -- it quickly and easily describes the routine defense of
TLC's actions that some of you like to engage in). The form my question took
was off the top of my head -- I could just as easily have asked: "Why are
you discontinuing a brisk selling accessory item even if it means creating a
replacement mold?" or some such thing.  The question rhetorically asks for
an explanation and is not a trick question that I can see. If undue emphasis
is to be given the word "smart" and that is the key word that makes the
question somehow unfair, I guess you are suggesting that TLC doesn't have
"smart" reasons for the things it does -- with which I might tend to agree.

BTW, the fact that I know it's a famous trick question doesn't mean that
everyone knows this, and this IS a public forum.  That's why I called
attention to this fact immediately.  Many may also not realize that I am not
married and hence have no wife -- again, something people do not necessarily
know.  You claim it was used innocently, and I guess that's possible -- but
I am suspicious of this claim.  I wouldn't be annoyed if you canceled that
post and replaced it with one without the offending trick question.

-- Hop-Frog



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brad J Brickfest 2002 Keynote Speech synopsis
 
(...) Hmm. I didn't intend it to be a statement of your character - I've seen enough of your posts to know you're intelligent enough to see it for exactly what it was - "a famous trick question". I was highlighting, admittedly in an oblique way, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

85 Messages in This Thread:





































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR