Subject:
|
Re: "There are always possibilities" (possible braod Ep. II Spoilers)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:30:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
615 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> POSSIBLE Spoilers for Episode II are below....
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In lugnet.starwars, Terry Keller writes:
>
> > I just saw ST-EP1 again today, and found myself getting annoyed at many of • GL's
> > inclusions of "cute" stuff. Those lighthearted, humorous moments really
> > detract from the experience, IMO. I really hope the next episode is more
> > serious - which would be a good reason to have Cameron direct. If they are
> > going to depict the Republic embroiled in the clone wars, I would hope they • get
> > a director who is adept at creating a visceral, edge-of-your-seat, yes - even
> > Rambo-esque - excitement.
> >
> > Enough of the pandering to 6 to 10 year-olds who want 'cute'.
>
> Well, to that end, I read today that Ahmed Best (aka Jar Jar Binks) was
> reporting that Jar Jar is only to be in Episode I. Apparently, he's hoping • for
> a groundswell of fan support to get Lucas to put Jar Jar in future Episodes
> (snort).
>
> Don't get-a me wrongo. I like Jar Jar well enough, and I feel he had a role • to
> fill in this movie, but I'd be perfectly happy if we never, ever saw him
again.
I have to agree with Eric. The character was different enough so that not
everyone in the universe seemed or talked the same, but apparently like most of
the characters in the film I have no great love for Jar-Jar.
I occasionally found it difficult, if not impossible, to understand his
dialogue, as his accent was often affected to the point of unintelligibility.
I think the Jar-Jar character would have sounded much better with a
lower-pitched voice.
The trade federation toadies also suffered from unintelligibility, but not as
much. I understand these are not supposed to be "English" speaking characters,
but the audience here in America is, and if we can't readily understand them,
then either redub the voiceovers or use subtitles.
It is also quite likely the theatre in which I saw the movie twice(1) suffers
from an inferior sound system, but I thought all that was supposed to be taken
care of.
-Tom McD.
when replying, meesa gonna cuddout da spamcake.
(1) Much of the reason I went the second time was to try and understand more of
the lines I couldn't make out before.(2)
(2) I even sat in a different place in the theatre thinking that I might be in
a "dead spot".(3)
(3) I might go again just to make sure ;-)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
