Subject:
|
Re: "There are always possibilities"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jun 1999 18:32:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
658 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, David Simmons writes:
> > How often can it be argued that a sequel is as good or better than the
> > original?
> >
> > -- Terry K --
>
> Aliens is one of the exceptions.
I'll argue with that :) IMO, they were too different: Alien was really a
haunted house picture, and Aliens was an adventure/shoot-'m-up flick.
> Also:
>
> Empire Strikes Back (duh!)
"All too easy.."
> ST II The Wrath of Khan
Definitely agree there.
> Dawn of the Dead
Both the first and the second movie have to have a real plot in order to
compare them ;)
> Bride of Chucky (better than the first three!)
Someone actually saw that? Wow.
> I'm sure there are a few I'm missing.
That's okay. I'm missing them too. I have a good memory, but sometimes my
recall is shot.
-Tom McD.
when replying, you don't want a sequel to spamcake. trust me.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "There are always possibilities"
|
| (...) Aliens is one of the exceptions. Also: Empire Strikes Back (duh!) ST II The Wrath of Khan Dawn of the Dead Bride of Chucky (better than the first three!) I'm sure there are a few I'm missing. Dave (25 years ago, 7-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
