Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:37:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1611 times
|
| |
|
|
"Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in news:Gyt8H8.GHr@lugnet.com...
> > This is simply not true. Read http://news.lugnet.com/publish/?n=3527 about
> > my fake ad with the LEGO logo that was deleted from the server. • [...]
> Do you mean the ad in this folder:
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=20217
>
> That doesn't look deleted to me.
You didn't read the thread, did you? The picture is not deleted *ANYMORE*! I
had to re-upload an updated version of it! It was then a few times toggled
between public and unpublic and now it's public, finally. That's what we all
say: It feels like arbitrariness. One cannot be sure, if something *will* be
accepted or *will not* be accepted. You simply have to try and wait for a few
days and see what happens.
..oli
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) You diddn't read what I just wrote did you? There was no "arbitrariness", it simply was not obvious at first glance that it was on-topic. *Most uploads don't have that problem* because they obviously contain LEGO. I don't think it's fair to me (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) Yes, it is true. Do you mean the ad in this folder: (URL) doesn't look deleted to me. I don't see any reason why it would be (without complaint from a trademark/copyright holder). In fact, I remember looking at those pictures closely when they (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
