Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:44:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1840 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Anthony Sava writes:
> Why set them aside for further review?
>
> What is in question?
>
> I've seen his pictures, they're not pornographic.
You forgot to add IMHO or IMO to that sentence. (Note that I'm not claiming
that they are, but I certainly now people who might think that).
> The majority deals with the
> bible and it's topics, and does not every christian church give free and full
> access of the bible to children?
I don't think the bible as endorsed by most Christian churches necessarily
contains pictures.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) Why? Why set them aside for further review? What is in question? I've seen his pictures, they're not pornographic. The majority deals with the bible and it's topics, and does not every christian church give free and full access of the bible to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
