Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:06:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1712 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, John Herre writes:
> There seems to be some miscommunication here.
>
> When the image was deleted, Oliver posted asking why it was deleted. He
> received a response from Larry, who wrote that he did not delete it, and was
> not sure why it was deleted, but speculated that it may have been deleted
> because of trademark and copyright issues (see
> http://news.lugnet.com/publish/?n=3528). He did not state that any image
> definately has been deleted because of trademark and copyright issues.
If it was deleted, it should not have been. I know I did not delete it.
> Oliver resubmitted the image with the LEGO logo replaced with a spoof of the
> logo. This time, the image was approved. The logo may have had nothing to do
> with the image being deleted, but, at this point, it seemed that it did.
Since this is obviously too complicated a process, I have removed moderator
privileges from every user that had them besides me. That way there will
be no confusion. It will take longer for things to be moderated, but
I'm sure that's a small price to pay for having things moderated correctly.
KL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| There seems to be some miscommunication here. When the image was deleted, Oliver posted asking why it was deleted. He received a response from Larry, who wrote that he did not delete it, and was not sure why it was deleted, but speculated that it (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
