Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 14:52:13 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1476 times
|
| |
| |
Hello!
> For Brickshelf, "on topic" is a very
> simple and sharp distinction. Is the content in any way
> related to LEGO products? If so, it's on-topic.
That seems clear.
> Is it "safe" for kids
Well, that seems not to be so clear.
How do you define "safe for kids"?
OK, no porn. I totally agree.
But where begins "porn"? In my opinion this girl licking her ice (out of ABS)
does not count as porn. It may be erotic in a way (because it is a beautiful
girl) but not dangerous for kids.
And what about violence? There are so many folders that contain war glorifying
buildings or even bloody minifigs. I do not say that this is dangerous for
children (I'm not a psychologist) but I think it's also not the best theme for
kids to deal with.
And what about alcohol? There are also many folders with taverns and inns. And
I can't believe that you can get there just orange juice and hot chocolate. :-)
http://home.arcor.de/chutspe/6067adult.jpg
So what are the criterias for "safe for kids"?
Thanks and regards
Jojo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) Dan, I think you may be overreacting a bit. Moderation is based upon two very basic guidelines. Is it "safe" for kids, and is it on topic. For Brickshelf, "on topic" is a very simple and sharp distinction. Is the content in any way related to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|