Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 00:24:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1624 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Daniel Siskind wrote:
> > My disagreement isn't necessarily directed towards Larry (and I should
> > thank him for making most of my files public at a very early stage),
> > but he illustrates a good point in what is wrong with this current
> > situation. If I hold anyone accountable for this whole mess, I would
> > say that Kevin fumbled from the get go when he announced his decision
> > without thorough explanation. The only way I know Kevin is from his
> > commendable service to the community, which up until now I never
> > thought to question. I have read a lot of responses and suggestions
> > posed since full (pre-emptive) moderation was announced, but so far no
> > one has pointed out how rotten it really is.
>
> you're allowed to have your opinion, but I think Kevin did exactly what
> he should have done. But tell me this - why is the moderation so rotten?
> Because you can't view your pictures in the recent folders? Or people
> can't view your "folder"? why not just create a webpage, with an index
> (perhaps even with descriptions, imaging that!) and link to your
> pictures on BS. You still get the free hosting and bandwidth, and don't
> need to deal with the moderation!
>
> > By not showing the content, it may as well not exist. If there was a
> > problem with TOS violations, then why was it not removed a long time
> > ago? Again, not a problem with Larry, but with how this is being
> > handled.
>
> "may as well not exist". Link to it from your web page, and you'll never
> know it wasn't moderated.
This is true, but misses the point. All that is being asked for by me is
some more concrete understanding of what to approve, and what not to, and
what to do with things that are questionable.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| Why is it that the good Reverend has everyone of his folders moderated? Rev's gallery: (URL) must have come up on the random hit list and is pretty high up the host hits ladder. Some 'celebrities' have had all their folders cleared within days of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) you're allowed to have your opinion, but I think Kevin did exactly what he should have done. But tell me this - why is the moderation so rotten? Because you can't view your pictures in the recent folders? Or people can't view your "folder"? (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
