Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 04:16:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1622 times
|
| |
|
|
Why is it that the good Reverend has everyone of his folders moderated?
Rev's gallery: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=revbps
He must have come up on the random hit list and is pretty high up the host
hits ladder. Some 'celebrities' have had all their folders cleared within
days of this. My only conclusion that it's the religious content of some of
his folders. But what then of his BrickWar and his stadium folders. I can't
imagine that no moderator hasn't stumbled across him yet, and this wealth of
creation the Rev has made seems to be tied up in an inability to assess it's
content and idelogical avoidance. Why can't you just have a general pg
rating for the folders and anything that falls under clear it. Currently I
have 3 folders that are still in moderation mode.
My gallery: http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=silversmurfer
One is my ToyFair article scans which I'm guessing may breach some sort of
copyright issue. Another folder is my contact folder which I tagged as
off-topic. It has a screenshot of my website, a contact txt doc and a lego
related rant. Another folder is all my drawings I've done that are Lego
related done over the course of 15 years. This one I'm not sure why it
hasn't been cleared, although the other 2 are understandable. However in the
Rev's situation it seems to me to be preferential mistreatment.
cheers, Joseph
ps: in no means am I raising myself to the highest of standards that the Rev
embodies in bricksmithery by posting both our galleries in the same post. my
clumsy paws can make a crow's call to the Rev's escaped songbird always out
of reach and wonderful to behold.
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger writes:
> > In lugnet.publish, Daniel Siskind wrote:
> > > My disagreement isn't necessarily directed towards Larry (and I should
> > > thank him for making most of my files public at a very early stage),
> > > but he illustrates a good point in what is wrong with this current
> > > situation. If I hold anyone accountable for this whole mess, I would
> > > say that Kevin fumbled from the get go when he announced his decision
> > > without thorough explanation. The only way I know Kevin is from his
> > > commendable service to the community, which up until now I never
> > > thought to question. I have read a lot of responses and suggestions
> > > posed since full (pre-emptive) moderation was announced, but so far no
> > > one has pointed out how rotten it really is.
> >
> > you're allowed to have your opinion, but I think Kevin did exactly what
> > he should have done. But tell me this - why is the moderation so rotten?
> > Because you can't view your pictures in the recent folders? Or people
> > can't view your "folder"? why not just create a webpage, with an index
> > (perhaps even with descriptions, imaging that!) and link to your
> > pictures on BS. You still get the free hosting and bandwidth, and don't
> > need to deal with the moderation!
> >
> > > By not showing the content, it may as well not exist. If there was a
> > > problem with TOS violations, then why was it not removed a long time
> > > ago? Again, not a problem with Larry, but with how this is being
> > > handled.
> >
> > "may as well not exist". Link to it from your web page, and you'll never
> > know it wasn't moderated.
>
> This is true, but misses the point. All that is being asked for by me is
> some more concrete understanding of what to approve, and what not to, and
> what to do with things that are questionable.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) they are not unmoderated, but they are not yet public either. I'm sure that's no problem for Brendan, since he deep links to them on his website. I think everyone needs to take a deep breath and relax and wait for us to catch up on moderation. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) This is true, but misses the point. All that is being asked for by me is some more concrete understanding of what to approve, and what not to, and what to do with things that are questionable. (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
