Subject:
|
Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:12:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1638 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Daniel Siskind writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger writes:
> >
> > you're allowed to have your opinion, but I think Kevin did exactly what
> > he should have done. But tell me this - why is the moderation so rotten?
> > Because you can't view your pictures in the recent folders? Or people
> > can't view your "folder"? why not just create a webpage, with an index
> > (perhaps even with descriptions, imaging that!) and link to your
> > pictures on BS. You still get the free hosting and bandwidth, and don't
> > need to deal with the moderation!
>
> Oh really? I didn't notice a need for every posting to be reviewed before
> being posted. Now everything, including stuff that has been viewed thousands
> of times before, is now under scutiny and with just the vaguest of idea of
> what is and what is not acceptable.
That is false. There is one moderator and the rules could not possibly
be simpler or more transparent.
People's vivid imagination appears to be much more interesting than
reality when it comes to Brickshelf moderation.
KL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
| (...) Oh really? I didn't notice a need for every posting to be reviewed before being posted. Now everything, including stuff that has been viewed thousands of times before, is now under scutiny and with just the vaguest of idea of what is and what (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
