Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:02:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1304 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.people, Jason King writes:
>
> > You are right Leadership is the answer but I can't see where that leadership
> > will come from, LUGNET has grown to a point that looking after it would be a
> > full time job...
>
> So maybe it's time for us to ante up. I wonder how many of the ~1500 members
> would stick around at $25 per year?
I wonder what the subscription fee would be if we wanted to pay somebody to
run this show FT? What would the "going rate" be if an individual from the
USA was employed?
I really doubt 1500*$25 ($37500) would be enough?
Scott A
=+=
Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet?
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=scotta
"A reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable
man persists in attempting to adapt his environment to suit himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." (GBS)
=+=
>
> Everyone (myself included) should remember this web page:
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/finance/donations/
>
> Chris
>
> (How do I find the amount of my membership fee that I still owe?)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:Gsv03y.HtD@lugnet.com... (...) leadership (...) be a (...) members (...) to (...) Hi Scott, Add me to the list of those wondering the same thing. -- Jason King LugNet #665 (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) Hmmm...you've got a point there...I guess It's an issue of both of the topics above, one being 'how many members would remain', and the other being the 'membership price'. I don't think an annual fee would be bad. I could easily afford $25 a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
| | | how much is enough?
|
| (...) well, first of all, some of that $ would go to server costs. but you could pay a number of 'volunteers' the equiv of part-time pay above and beyond their day-jobs. 1) you get better results from the 'employee' (or they get fired) 2) you get (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| (...) So maybe it's time for us to ante up. I wonder how many of the ~1500 members would stick around at $25 per year? Everyone (myself included) should remember this web page: (URL) do I find the amount of my membership fee that I still owe?) (22 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
