| |
In lugnet.people, Rico Lovelace writes:
> I'm happy for the two of you and your special relationship.
> <grins>
Funny, very funny. Isn't it against the TOS to throw in nasty comments.
> Back those words up?
> So you want me to tally up just how constructive Tim has been to the
> community and thus compare his endeavors to that of the general group?
> Get real!
> How about you try to respect the personal statements of another....
> Like I said before, relations to various individuals are simply relative!
> To me, he was “just another user.”
> To you, he could be a long lost soul-mate who shares similar passions for Lego?
> What I said about not knowing Tim was my opinion. You don’t need to jump-out
> and say how super-special he is, cause I don’t care.
Fine. Be as negative as you want. There's no need to add more negativity to
Lugnet as it is. Use your time more wisely. I, for instance don't spend 10
out of 11 posts going against the TOS (or part of it)
>
> Great, then let’s deal with it.
> Highlighting a post iz not a method of creating constructive change.
> If you wanna make things happy-better then work with the community,
> talk with the administrators. Just don’t highlight a hiatus-post without
> expressing why you think it important to the community.
I never highlighted this post. You shouldn't assume things like that.
As for this, I believe thois discussion might bring some positive change for
Lugnet. My expression on this? It's a bit disturbing to see a prominent
member of the community walk off like that. If you don't care, that's fine
with me. I can't make you care, realizing the importance of this argument is
up to yourself.
>
> BTW, what were you reasons for posting?
I'm just trying to say that all this negative energy should be used for
constructive reasons.
> To agree with Ben and to say how fabulous Tim iz?!?
> That’s nice for you.
Whatever. If you don't care that's fine with me. That's being a bit ignorant
though. If I were you, I'd look into the positive changes Tim has brought
into the community, such as maintenance od LDRaw .org, as well as others.
This argument isn't making Lugnet any better, so let's get back to a
positive discussion for once.
If you want to dicsuss this further, take it to Email. Lugnet doesn't need this.
<<_Matt Hein_>>
Lugnet member No. 1112
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: On Hiatus
|
| I'm happy for the two of you and your special relationship. <grins> But this iz not the issue... (...) Back those words up? So you want me to tally up just how constructive Tim has been to the community and thus compare his endeavors to that of the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
