Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:14:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3952 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Jason King writes:
> You are right Chris a higher membership fee would probably help Lugnet in
> someway. And I would be more than happy to pay. The enjoyment i get from
> LUGNET is definately worth it..
I think many of us agree. So why aren't we paying? In my case, I just keep
meaning to. I bet there's a lot of that.
> However some of our members are still teenagers and they might not be able
> to afford the extra $$$ , and to lose them as members because of money would
> be sad..
It would. But $25 per year is something that _any_ North American teen who is
well off enough to enjoy LEGO and computer use can afford. It just is. I was
sixteen sixteen years ago. I could have afforded it then with ease in 1985
dollars.
> Another thing that just popped into my head was Fund-Raising Auctions for
> LUGNET.
> If we could get donations of LEGO sets or pieces we could either auction the
> sets off or part them out and auction the parts off. All funds raised could
> be donated to LUGNET to help with administration etc.
> I would be happy to donate LEGO and/or help run the auctions etc.
>
> What do you think??
Sure. It could even use the AucZilla engine if they were participating. I
suspect that for it to be really helpful, someone else would have to act as the
clearing house.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
| You are right Chris a higher membership fee would probably help Lugnet in someway. And I would be more than happy to pay. The enjoyment i get from LUGNET is definately worth it.. However some of our members are still teenagers and they might not be (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
