| |
Bones Dragon wrote:
>
> I've been following the discussion here a bit, and I just wanted
> to put in my $0.02... I have to agree with some of what others
> have already been said. This whole auction seems very
> ill-planned. Over the course of the week, while the auction
> is RUNNING, he's slowly and gradually updating the webpage
> with set lists and details... No one is going to bid 95k, more
> than 1 to 3 year's pay depending on what you do, when there's
> just some blurry pictures, incomplete lists, and his word that
> it's worth that much. Even a consortium would have a difficult
> time pulling that together in the time allotted. It's just absurd.
> And if he's really out of work and needs the money, shouldn't
> that imply that he has the time to sort it out and sell it off set
> by set?
Sorting out by set REALLY isn't worth it. Trust me. Now it is true that
one could sort into related parts and sell those off, and in fact, if
the collection is at all sorted, this can be very easy.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
88 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
