To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.nalugOpen lugnet.org.ca.nalug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / NALUG / 162
161  |  163
Subject: 
Re: New Interurban/Trolley model, perfect for those downtown scenes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.ca.nalug
Date: 
Wed, 27 Sep 2000 04:03:10 GMT
Reply-To: 
[cmasi@cmasi]nospam[.chem.tulane.edu]
Viewed: 
19 times
  
Chris Gray wrote:

"SRC" <SteveRC@StarTrekMail.com> writes:

In lugnet.trains.org, Frank Filz writes:
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
...Not trying to restart the "do we need the NMRA?" debate again but
I did want to see if any bridges get built that weren't there before.

I think we have a legitimate sub-hobby of model railroading, plus I
think it is a great way to make model railroading more accessible (and
not just to kids, many people find their ability to work with fine
detail is greatly diminished as they get older).

The organizer for SuperTrain 2001 wanted us to participate specifically
because our display was far and away the most popular with the kids.
If kids don't get interested in model trains, (so that new members
join) the hobby will die out as its participants do.

SRC

[deliberately violating the FUT, to include lugnet.org.ca.nalug]

It doesn't seem to me like the hobby is in any danger of dying out. Looking
at Kevin's magazines, the layouts at the show, and the crowds that came to
see them, I'd say its as healthy as ever. Moreso than the real things!

A typical model railroading club likely wouldn't encourage new members
younger than about early teens. The models are too small, too expensive,
and just don't have the "playability" that younger kids normally want.
Early teens is the upper end of the group normally attracted to Lego
(ignoring all us AFOLs, etc.). So, I don't see us as necessarily helping
the normal train clubs get new members. Getting kids interested in trains
in general is the big thing, whether they be Lego trains, trains in
computer programs, real trains, trains in books, etc.

--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation.

Chris Gray     cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA
               http://www.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA/cg/

Sorry, couldn't resist...

Nice sig. It made me laugh.

Thanks,
Chris
--
PGP public key available upon request.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New Interurban/Trolley model, perfect for those downtown scenes
 
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Actually, a couple of the NMRA brass-types admitted to me that this is a real and significant problem they're experiencing. Sure, benchmarks continue to be raised but there is a measurable vacuum at the entry level, (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Interurban/Trolley model, perfect for those downtown scenes
 
(...) [deliberately violating the FUT, to include lugnet.org.ca.nalug] It doesn't seem to me like the hobby is in any danger of dying out. Looking at Kevin's magazines, the layouts at the show, and the crowds that came to see them, I'd say its as (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)

70 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR